Today we move on to the Dialogue section of section of my book, Flogging the Quill, Crafting a Novel that Sells: “Tags: a game writers shouldn’t play”
Because each of us has a lifetime of experience with talking, writing dialogue in a novel seems like it should be easy, and maybe it is for some writers. But for others it’s the weakest part of their narrative. Three common flaws I see in beginning work are:
- Botched use of dialogue tags
- Lack of effective action beats
- Explaining the dialogue instead of showing it happen
Here’s a snippet of dialogue guaranteed to make you flinch:
“Please don’t do that,” he articulated.
“What?” she interrogated.
Okay, perhaps that’s a touch over the top. But how many times have you seen dialogue tags like the following?
Melissa turned to Irving. “Why don’t you zip up your pants?” she asked.
He shrugged. “Air conditioning,” he replied.
What’s with “she asked” and “he replied”? The question mark clearly tells the reader that a question was asked, and the response is clearly a reply, and the reader damn well knows what they were. Yet “she asked” and the ever-popular “he replied” clog thousands of pages like verbal cholesterol.
When it comes to dialogue tags, a couple of clichés should be applied:
1. Less is more.
2. KISS—Keep It Simple, Stupid
Tags can tangle dialogue and slow pace; their absence can smooth and accelerate. Over-explanatory tags (he huffed, she whimpered) create lazy writing; replacing them with action or description gives the words meaning and tone that involves the reader, creates pictures, and enhances emotional effect.
Rarely is there a need for a dialogue tag other than “said,” even with a question. For example, there’s no need to use “asked” or “interrogated” or “queried” if you write
Farnsworth said, “Where do you think the monster is hiding?”
The reader understands that Farnsworth has asked a question—that’s what question marks are for. To add tonality, use description and action, and remove the “said.” For example:
Farnsworth’s voice came from under the couch in a whispery hiss that ended with a sob. “Where do you think the monster is hiding?”
To illustrate minimizing dialogue tags in a scene, here’s an excerpt from my novel, We the Enemy. In the scene, Marion Smith-Taylor, the U.S. Attorney General, is calling her office from out of town. See what you think, tag-wise.
Time enough for one last hail-Mary call—she opened her cell phone and auto-dialed her office. Suzanne Fisher answered. “Ms. Smith-Taylor’s office, how may I help you?”
Marion pictured Suzanne, not in an office outfit but bundled up in her pale blue terry-cloth robe, blond hair tousled, fair cheeks flushed. If Marion had her druthers, Suzanne would be helping her to a tumbler of Scotch—but that would have to wait until she was home. “Hi, it’s me.”
“I was just thinking about you.”
That was one of the things Marion loved about Suzanne—no coy games, she just said how she felt. “Me, too. Listen, they’re about to get here. Anything on the Alliance from Joe Donovan or Sally Arnold?”
“No word.”
“Damn.” She’d been praying for better information on the Oregon situation before the meeting. But she wasn’t surprised; Joe and Sally had been less than helpful for months. Something had changed with them. “If you hear from them in the next hour, call.”
“I will.”
Damn. Damn-damn-damn.
Seven speeches from two characters and no dialogue tags. And I’ll bet you didn’t get lost.
Enough articulated?
What about “he thought?”—on using internal monologue
A common way of indicating the thoughts of a character are to signal with “he thought” and then include the thought in italics or use quotes.
But italics can be hard to read, quotes can lead to confusing thoughts with dialogue, and writing “he thought” isn’t really necessary.
You can include a character’s thoughts as a part of the narrative via internal monologue. Very simply, it’s the thought expressed in the same person and tense as the rest of the narrative. For example, in this scene the protagonist, Jake, sees a woman being assaulted in an alley:
The woman staggered her attacker with a kick to his leg. He slapped her, and then had to dodge a knee aimed at his crotch. Girl had guts. Jake sighed, stepped into the alley, and drew his nine-millimeter Glock from the holster under his windbreaker.
“Girl had guts” is a snippet of internal monologue showing Jake’s thought. It’s a lot quicker and cleaner than this:
Jake thought, the girl has guts.
Here’s a passage with a couple of instances of internal monologue from the woman who was being attacked. This happens after Jake intervenes and stops the attack. We’re now in her point of view.
Jewel settled herself down. Her mama had always said, “In this world, you got to be hard. Ain’t nobody there for you but you.” Hallelujah, Mama.
She’d been lucky today. She felt compelled to thank the guy, even if he was white—Mama’d taught her manners, too. Jewel hurried after him, trying to arrange her torn top into decent coverage, but one tit or the other kept falling out. Great, now she had to walk down Michigan Avenue with her boobs hanging out. And wouldn’t they love it back at the office.
Here, “Hallelujah, Mama” is internal monologue. And so is
Great, now she had to walk down Michigan Avenue with her boobs hanging out. And wouldn’t they love it back at the office.
In Self-editing for Fiction Writers, authors Renni Browne and Dave King give a good example of this technique, which they call “interior monologue.”
Big Jim Billups fondled the .38 in his pocket, waddled over to the back of his truck, and spat. Could’ve stopped the whole damn thing last night—they don’t carry no guns. What was the use of doing a job if you didn’t do a good one? He rocked, shifting his weight from one leg to another and spat again. The sound of the marchers was closer now. Soon it would be time.
As Browne and King point out, readers move easily from Big Jim’s actions to his thoughts and back again without being aware of what they’re doing. Renni and Dave’s chapter on interior monologue gives excellent guidelines on the artful use of the technique.
For what it’s worth
Ray