My Photo

Sites to See

February 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      
Blog powered by TypePad

.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    « We pause for a note on showing versus telling | Main | New bookshelf and February Workshops »

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83453034869e20168e55c7481970c

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Flogometer for Sheri--would you turn the page?:

    Comments

    P A Wilson

    I agree with your comments, but I would have read a bit further before giving up.

    I did wonder why the piece isn't written in first person, if Sarah is the protagonist, it's easier to get in her head, if you are writing from her head.

    EddieTol

    I agree with Ray, this was close but the writing sort of got in the way. I, too, was confused over which side of the door you were referring to. You start out great, with lots of tension and action, but the lack of clarity with your second sentence detracted from your opening.

    I also struggled with some of the imagery you used. Thinking about splinters of doorframe falling to the ground didn't resonate with me. I can see splinters flying or chunks of the doorframe falling to the ground, but splinters falling lacked the impact that the scene needed.

    I agree with Ray that the use of the word 'intermittently' was awkward and weakened the scene. Another word, or a reworking of that section, which Ray suggests, would help.

    I liked the story and wanted to read on but the writing was a little cumbersome and made me hesitant to venture on knowing there would be more of the same. I would consider re-reading this with a critical eye toward trimming this down and looking for better, cleaner and more concise ways to convey the scene. Not only your opening, but the rest of the manuscript.

    What you did well was raise a question that I wanted to know the answer to. I connected with her enough to want to know how the scene turned out.

    ET -

    N A Hart

    I second (or is it "fourth" by now) everything Ray said. The point of view issues confused me and I kept trying to figure out whose head I was in, less on what was going on.

    As far as what's going on, this is where it gets subjective: I don't like the first page finding someone in a horrible, violent situation. It's too much of a slap in the face and it actually gets in the way of me attaching to the POV character. I'd rather know something, anything, have any minor connection before seeing her/him in such peril. But others probably prefer an opening like this one :-)

    Doug

    I agree, it's the writing craft that's a problem. Most of the glitches are small stuff, but there are a *lot* of small glitches in here, especially in the way that actions are being connected together.

    In addition to what's already been mentioned:

    In paragraph 4: "maybe he had left" would be better as "maybe he had gone." Generally, "left" isn't used alone: "He left his keys," "She left home," or "They left for the coffee shop."

    Immediately following that is the word "Suddenly," which is like an exclamation point: use it sparingly, and for effect.

    Paragraph 5: Ray already fixed it without comment, but the "as" in the final sentence of this paragraph is incorrect because it says that Sarah stepped forward at the same time that he grabbed her by the throat, with no cause-and-effect.

    Paragraph 6: The participles ("ing" words) have over-run the first sentence. You've got three things going on simultaneously: shaking, backing, and saying — do those really need to be simultaneous? The most amusing part is that the wall is saying "Damn right..."

    The big glitch: "Damn right you won’t tell!" Where did this come from? Sarah had been pleading "I take it back," "I didn't mean it," and "I’ll leave and won’t come back," but there's nothing there about telling. I'll grant that it's reasonable that Frankie and Sarah have different understandings as to what the fight is about — maybe that's why there's a fight in the first place — but if that's the case, I don't know that I'd want it just dropped on us poor readers without any foreshadowing or other hints.

    Paragraph 8: I didn't understand how swinging at him led to her arms falling to her sides. I suspect that the word "until" isn't what you were looking for.

    "As she began to collapse" is confusing. The "began" suggests (duh) the beginning of an action, but the "as" says that the action is on-going. We also have Frankie simultaneously releasing her, which means he formed the intent to release her before she began to collapse, again with no cause-and-effect. Ray's discussed this before:
    http://www.floggingthequill.com/flogging_the_quill/2006/08/watch_your_as.html

    The content is there, but the writing keeps the actions from flowing.

    flibgibbet

    Action scenes are difficult to write well. They can easily devolve into melodrama, are often over-written, and that's how this one read to me.

    Action in the opening scene is harder still, and writer's often succumb to the "as you know Bob..." to reveal as much backstory as possible. I see a little of that here.

    I think the story has promise, but the craft needs work. I'd suggest an opening line dedicated to scene sitting, as in "Sarah sat crouched in the corner of the entryway(wherever)as Frankie's fists threatened to break down the front door..."

    And while I'm a big fan of "said" as a tag, I don't think it works here for Frankie's first line. I'd break the "rules", leave off the exclamation point, and use something like "commanded". In fact, I think it's more frightening if Frankie isn't shouting, but speaking in a barely controlled voice. I'd also work on his and her dialogue. As written, I see it as a missed opportunity to reveal specific characters, and as Doug said it doesn't make sense.

    In order to show and not tell that Sarah is pregnant, perhaps she could try and protect her abdomen/unborn child during this fight.

    My biggest bugaboo though, has to be her backing up, then moving toward him once he puts his arms out (as if to embrace her). I just can't see that as a rational action/reaction from either one of them.

    Once again, the story has promise and with practice this could be really good. Best of luck author.

    Beth

    The lack of clarity in POV was the first problem I noticed, followed by other writing issues. But what really kept me from engaging with this was not knowing that they're fighting about. There's a lot of sound and fury, but it doesn't signify much with motivation. I would guess that there's a better place to begin this story.

    Beth

    Oops! I meant to say, "...it doesn't signify much withOUT motivation."

    Sheri

    Thanks, you guys. This gives me a lot to work with. She actually dies in this scene (house history)and then the story fast forwards to present time, yet she never really leaves the house. The book deals in unraveling what is happening in this scene, among other issues.

    N A Hart

    Sheri, it sounds like this scene is more of a prologue, telling the reader what they "have to know" before the story starts. This is so subjective, but as a reader, I don't like prologues. I have to be talked into buying books with them. If I open a book by a new-to-me author and I see a prologue, I put it down and walk away.

    How would your story change if you didn't give this scene to the reader first? If you started in at the beginning of the story and hinted at this scene in little drips until the moment it is really important for the current participants in the story to know? By then, we might really care for Sarah and we will be terrified and weepy while we're reading because it's happening to someone we *know," so it's personal and not just a tease.

    I apologize for being so passionately anti-prologue, but I encourage you to imagine how it would change if you withheld this story at the beginning. Sounds like a lot of deep things will be happening in your story.

    Bree

    Sheri,

    Knowing that she dies at the end of the first scene (as NA Hart says, the prologue) makes me *less* likely to want to read ahead. I agree with NA and think that maybe starting in present time and then weaving the history into the story elsewhere might be more effective.

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Working...
    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

    Working...

    Post a comment