My Photo

Sites to See

June 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Blog powered by TypePad

.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    « Flogometer for Liz—would you turn the page? | Main | Agent advice + FtQ chapter on inciting incident »

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83453034869e20133f412a6a4970b

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Flogometer for Brian—would you turn the page?:

    Comments

    Tory

    It's not that it's technically incorrect, but in the prologue the use of italics and switching to first POV for interior monologues drives me crazy. It just zaps me right out of the story's flow. I don't understand why people do this.

    The thing is, this is already written in close 3rd--he can feel them in his head, he's anxious, the New World seems hopeful to him. Why bother? Drop the italics, keep it in close third.

    "Once he got on a ship, maybe he'd feel safe. Maybe he'd be able to relax during the crossing. He wasn’t really sure why the New World seemed such a hopeful place; perhaps it was just that Europe had become so treacherous, so dangerous, since a wild impulse led him to steal the stone now hidden under his filthy garment."

    It just flows so much better, imo.

    Kristy

    I said yes for both, but had the same qualms as Ray about transitioning into backstory so fast and particularly in the prologue. In my opinion, one of the most important things a prologue does is raise a big story question that the reader will be willing to read the rest of the book to figure out. By revealing so much information about the stone and Georg's motivation (or lack thereof) to steal it, the prologue's effectiveness is almost cancelled out.

    Ken Follett's prologue in Pillars of the Earth is a good example of how a prologue like this can be used effectively: a man is hanged, presumably unjustly, and the reason for it not revealed until the last few pages of the 1000pg book. By holding his cards and leaving the prologue as an unanswered question for so long, Follett keeps his readers thirsting for answers until the very end.

    glj

    I found both interesting enough to keep reading. Overall, seemed well written and I only had a couple of nitpicks.


    "Gerd Mendel, the Keeper of the Stone he’d worked with most closely, had explained that the power of the stone -- The Stone, Mendel always emphasized it"

    Small issues here. The wording "the Stone he'd worked with most closely" made me re-read, not immediately clear it was the "Keeper" he'd worked with closely, and I couldn't help reading it as he'd worked closely with the stone. Maybe "the stone keeper he'd worked with most closely" or similar?

    And the phrase "had explained that the power of the stone -- The Stone, Mendel always emphasized it" seems too complex. Why not "had explained that the power of it-- The Stone, Mendel always emphasized"?

    The phrase "since a wild impulse led him to steal the stone now hidden under his filthy garment" is redundant. You already told us he has it under his garment.

    On the first page, it didn't seem important to know how or why the protagonist went to the bank. Is it somehow significant? Or are you trying to show some aspect of her character? If you are merely trying to paint a normal day up to that point, it may be unnecessary.

    Bree

    I voted yes on the prologue and no on the chapter.

    Now, normally I don't mind a prologue, but I do mind when there is absolutely no connection between the scene in the prologue and the beginning of the book. I found the prologue scene interesting. I wondered about the stones and how this character was going to deal with his situation. Then it switched entirely to a new character, setting, time period and situation. I think that if one of those had been the same or at least similar, I would have felt more inclined to stick around and learn about what happened and why the prologue is important.

    If the first chapter was super compelling, I would probably ignore everything I just said and keep reading. The slip into backstory at the third paragraph made that unlikely.

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Working...
    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

    Working...

    Post a comment