My Photo

Sites to See

February 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      
Blog powered by TypePad

.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    « Story as river | Main | Flogometer for Kelley—would you turn the page? »

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83453034869e20133f325b88e970b

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Flogometer for Ray—would you turn the page?:

    Comments

    Douglas Martin

    The title and subject matter suggest a 'slick casual' approach consistent with the voice/tenor.

    However, the casual nature undermined the dramatic potential of the scene (unless, of course, that's the point). The writing can be tightened.

    Without more I simply do not know how seriously to take the set up or the kitty.

    I would not turn the page.

    Doug

    For once I'm challenged at finding much to pick at.

    Paragraph 1:

    A tense situation, an interesting voice, establishing the protag as being a kitty, and an intriguing premise are all accomplished within the opening sentence. That's a pretty dang good combination. Most of us have trouble getting *one* of those attributes in there.

    I might've left off the "I knew that" at the beginning and changed the "he would" to "he'd", and I'm not sure that "deserve" is the word I'd use. The repetition of "vampire" bothers me a bit, too.

    I'd end up with something like this:
    - If the coyote ate me he'd end up with a terminal case of indigestion, which is what you get for chewing on a kitty-cat chock full of the vampire virus, but by then I wouldn’t be in any condition to say gotcha.

    The phrase "being undead wasn't much of a life" is a hoot.

    Paragraph 2:

    I'd change the opening from "If it had" to "If it'd".

    I'd probably drop the final sentence as superfluous. We can assume that our protag expects that the coyote wants to eat him, and we find out in the next sentence where we are.

    Paragraph 3:

    I didn't care for opening with a participial phrase, even though there's nothing technically wrong with it. It just feels passive to me.

    The em-dash in the first sentence seems wrong; it makes me think that the coyote has just now spotted our protag. It also makes it sound like the protag kitty was also under the O when the coyote spotted him.

    Something like this suits me better:
    - I stayed crouched behind a scrub oak underneath the H in the HOLLYWOOD sign. I hadn’t heard any movement from the direction of the O, where I’d spotted him and from where he’d caught sight of me.

    The "he'd caught sight of me" is a borderline Point-of-View issue. I let it slide because the coyote presumably had visibly reacted and at this point, the detail of that reaction would just get in the way.

    Using the HOLLYWOOD sign as a setting is great. We know exactly where this scene is occurring without having to be told.

    Paragraph 4:

    I'd've changed the paragraph breaks between paragraphs 3 and 4:
    - The scrub oak, barely three feet tall and about that wide, was more bush than tree, and no barrier to a determined coyote.
    - The full moon I’d been enjoying now felt like a spotlight. I slunk low and peered beneath a branch. He wasn’t beneath the O anymore. Uh-oh.

    I stumbled slightly on "The full moon I'd been enjoying", until I figured out it meant "been enjoying before the coyote showed up".

    Final paragraph:

    This paragraph doesn't strike me as what I'd be thinking about upon having lost sight of the predator. I'd simply move this up between paragraphs 2 and 3. Or maybe merge it into the end of paragraph 1, where the protag is already musing about the nature of undead death.

    Doug

    Something else that occurs to me. This page contains only the two senses of vision and hearing. In this situation, I'd think that the question of being upwind or downwind of the coyote is a big factor.

    Normally, the H would be upwind of the O, so the coyote would be able to smell the kitty and not vice versa. If the Santa Anas are blowing, it'd be the other way 'round.

    glj

    It contains immediate intrigue. I would read on.

    I'm not familiar with the preceding book, but didn't feel that I needed any additional information here. You convey the characters and setting very well, with a minimum of words.

    Liz P

    No...

    But almost. I tripped up on the end of the last sentence--about keeping what he had. That sounds as if he's worried about dying, which doesn't make sense to me if he's a vampire.

    The second paragraph was cute, but it detracted from the rising tension for me. I'd move that piece somewhere later on and use something else there instead.

    Also, there's a typo in the first sentence of the last paragraph. (the second would doesn't belong)

    Jami Gold

    Hi Ray,

    Going back to your 6 things to look for, I'd say that you have the Story Questions, Voice, Scene Setting and Character. The two missing pieces are related to each other and I think Doug did a good job of elaborating on those points. The writing needs to be tightened. This would - in turn - make it clearer. The lack of tightness/clarity is hurting the tension right now.

    Ray Rhamey

    I don't understand the "lack of clarity" comment. What is worded in such a way as to not be immediately understandable?

    Jami Gold

    Ray,

    To me, the sentences are a bit too tangled, too many phrases or something. Tightening them, per Doug's suggestions, would make them easier to read. So, it's not that they're unclear from a technical perspective the way they are now, but the length/# of phrases makes it harder to follow. Like I have to pay more attention to get the gist of the sentence than I should.

    Heather

    I would have turned the page. Well, I say that, but the last paragraph threw me out of the setting. I probably still would have turned the page to find out whether the coyote would attack and… what the heck is going on with kitty-cat vampires. That said, here are my suggestions. Sorry. The comments are comment-y.

    I knew that if the coyote ate me he would end up with a terminal case of indigestion [I agree that it would be more concise to remove “I knew that if”], which is what you deserve if you chew on a vampire kitty-cat chock full of the vampire virus, but by then I wouldn’t be in any condition to say gotcha. [Here, for one, I’d break the sentence up a little for easier digestion (I’m hilarious…) and possibly try to rewrite with fewer words to grab yourself another usable line at the end. Maybe {The coyote would end up with a terminal case of indigestion—the price of eating a kitty-cat chock full of vampire virus. Unfortunately, I would be in no condition to say ‘gotcha’ from inside his belly.}] Although being undead wasn’t much of a life, I preferred holding on to what little I had. [Small change, but {Being undead wasn’t much of a life, but I preferred holding on to what little I had.} might save you a couple of characters; although, I realize when the line wraps, it no longer matters. Also, my condensing might totally screw with your voice, so take the suggestion with a grain of salt.]

    If it had been a dog instead of a coyote [I would nix "instead of a coyote" because we know it’s a coyote], I wouldn’t have worried—who worries about a creature that has devoted eons of evolution to mastering the arts of tail-wagging and drooling? [While it might lend to voice, I think you should weigh the value of all those words “who worries…eons of evolution…” against maybe getting another free line. Maybe something like {If it had been a dog—master of the arts of tail wagging and drooling—I wouldn’t have worried.}] But this guy was from a long line of finely tuned hunter-killers. And the word around Los Angeles was that coyotes had never met a cat they didn’t like. [While I’m not against it at all when done sparsely, there’s something about starting two sentences in a row with conjunctions that trips up the rhythm for me. Oddly it’s fixed for me, if you just combine the sentences {… hunter-killers, and the word around…} However, the phrase “hunter-killers” reminds me of Terminator (The robot HKs… but that might just be me and my sci-fi-ness)]

    Crouched behind a scrub oak underneath the H in the HOLLYWOOD sign, I hadn’t heard any movement from the direction of the O where I’d spotted him—and he’d caught sight of me. [“Telling vs. Showing” is a new formal concept for me, but this feels a little like telling. Maybe something more descriptive like {…from the direction of the O, where the shine of his yellow eyes had first fixed on me.} but less purple] The scrub oak, barely three feet tall and about that wide, was more bush than tree, and no barrier to a determined coyote. [I think you could take out “barely” and “more bush than tree, and” if you wanted to free up some space.] The full moon I’d been enjoying now felt like a spotlight. [I, personally, did not trip on the “enjoying” phrase, but I think it could be cut for space] I slunk low and peered beneath a branch. He wasn’t beneath the O anymore. [I get accused of setting scenes up (badly) like they’re playing in a movie, and this might be one of those moments… but consider showing the empty space beneath the O instead of telling us he’s no longer there.]

    Uh-oh. [The one place I do disagree with Doug. I like this on its own line. For me, it emphasizes the heartbeat (or not, if you’re undead) between noticing the coyote is gone and then actually realizing the panic of that observation. But! …It does waste lines. If you can steal lines from other paragraphs by condensing, I would leave it like it is.]

    What would being chewed up would do to my undead self? How much could he swallow before the virus turned him into a vampire coyote? Would I be an indigestible lump in his belly, giving “hairball” a whole new meaning? Creepy. Not to mention disgusting.

    [I would actually nix that last paragraph altogether (or if there’s a place later on to speculate about what eating a VKC would do to a predator, then put it there). There are some cute moments, but this is a crapcrapcrap moment, and stopping to think about digestion or whatnot breaks the tension for me (unless this scene is supposed to be comical). I’d rather just get to more of the stalking. In fact, I don’t know what the rating is on this story, but I might also suggest something stronger than “uh-oh” as the reaction to not knowing where the coyote is.

    My two cents. Of course, I’m new to the writing biz, so these suggestions might all be crapcrapcrap, too. Speaking of being new, I wanted to thank you for the blog. It’s really helped me. I hadn’t given any thought at all to the importance of the first page in that it’s all the agent/editor might ever see. My own first page is now dutifully driving me insane.]

    Liz P

    Addendum here:

    This is the sentence that is especially tripping everyone up--and at least giving me a bit of a pause.

    "...direction of the O where I’d spotted him—and he’d caught sight of me."

    That last bit makes it sound like they were both under the O, even though I know they're not from a previous sentence. Plus, that last bit sounds awkward to the ear. It doesn't quite flow.

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Working...
    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

    Working...

    Post a comment