My Photo

Sites to See

June 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Blog powered by TypePad

.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    « Flogometer for Stacy—would you turn the page? | Main | Flogometer for Scott—would you turn the page? »

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83453034869e20133f0ca6ae2970b

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Friday Fun and Flogometer for Liz—would you turn the page?:

    Comments

    Judi

    I know this is nitpicky, really, and I'm sorry for that. But four of the six paragraphs begin with Gary or Castor. Argh. :)

    Doug

    Part of my 'no' is because it's a generic action scene that not only doesn't raise any story questions, it's all over by the end of the page. There's no reason left for me to turn. Shooting's over, nothing to see here, everyone move along now.

    The other part of my 'no' is from the writing. Ray liked the writing; I didn't. You can't please everyone, and in the end it's the author who makes the choice. But I'll detail my complaints. (You knew that was coming, just from the length of this comment.)

    *Opening* a story with a participial phrase? Give me a moment to pull the arrow out of my heart.

    Castor "wandering" up to the bar probably isn't the verb you were looking for. Wandering is fundamentally aimless.

    I couldn't tell whose weapon was displayed in full view. This is the first sentence of a novel, and already you've confused me.

    I couldn't tell who was the "man with thirty thousand credits on his head". So two sentences in, I'm doubly confused. The third sentence put the pieces together for me, but I shouldn't have to have been rereading those first two sentences already in an attempt to figure out who was being referred to.

    The next sentence starts with "It was". Passive voice.

    I agree with Ray about not using the word "preferred". It raises the question of "preferred to what?", and there I go getting confused again.

    The second paragraph is better. I'd rather not see "and then" when either "and" or "then" alone would do, but that's being picky. I agree with Ray on the "shifted enough" being vague; it didn't paint any picture for me at all.

    I agree with Ray that "revealing the sharpened edge of one canine" wasn't clear. I think you were saying "revealing one sharpened canine", but I'm not sure. Slightly confused again.

    Ditto to Ray's comments on the next bits. I won't repeat them.

    I didn't understand who "the brat" was. A brat is a child, and Castor has already been described as "a man". Confusion again.

    Why is Castor coming over to Gary? What interest does he have in an anonymous drunkard?

    Is "prowled" the right verb for what Castor did? The term usually implies stealth, which I can't imagine in this situation. Otherwise, it implies searching, such as for prey, and again that doesn't apply.

    In the next-to-last sentence on the page, the comma after "moment" doesn't belong there.

    So there we are. Maybe it's just my age, but the writing kept leaving me confused: how was Castor wandering, who was displaying the weapon, who had the price on his head, what did Gary prefer corpse-hauling to, what kind of shifting did Gary do on the floor, what did the sharpened canine edge look like, how did Gary drop his head, who was the brat, how was Castor prowling, and why was Castor approaching Gary in the first place?

    Tamara

    I stumbled over "brat" as well.

    If Gary had a last name in the first sentence, like a Dean Koontz beginning, I'd like that.

    "Gary Lastname had stalked his bounty across the galaxy to a seedy bar on darkest Elba, where he prepared to take down Castor the CriminalDetail with his cheapest trick."

    That's not the best sentence, but that's my humble opinion.

    Jean

    Sorry, this is my genre and I just couldn't get into it. Too many uses of Gary and Castor and even with all the proper names, it was still confusing as to who was doing what in several spots as Doug mentioned.

    Upon first read, I thought Gary really was drunk and wondered how he was competent at the end.

    The use of "brat" threw me too as I associate that term with unruly children, not grown men.

    If Gary is already sprawled on the ground watching his target, how does his head drop?

    In the end, Gary already seems to have his target, so there's nothing to entice me to read on.

    Michael

    My no is for a simple reason, though I could give others. The omniscient point-of-view doesn't give me a clear picture of protagonist/antagonist and is simply sloppy, untrained writing. Put us in Gary's head and keep us there for the scene or put us in Castor's head and keep us there for the scene. Put us in both heads and I end up with a headache.

    There are other problems, but this alone is enough for rejection. Sometimes, craft is important, and point-of-view is a craft item that needs to be learned.

    Liz P

    Thanks for the feedback. :)

    I agree with most of the comments, and I'll see how to straighten it out better. I didn't even notice all the paragraphs starting with a name. lol. And obviously, I need to clarify what I mean with some of my sentences.

    So far as the scene being "over", I do hope that people would turn to see if things go horribly awry. Which they do.

    The only comment I don't agree with would be that this is in omniscient. It is clearly third-person, limited, in Gary's head. Else I'm sure Ray would have mentioned that it was in both heads and would have corrected me.

    Bernita

    I agree with Ray,I like this, but with caveats.
    Though I favour lean 'n mean writing, I think perhaps you have pared it down too much. It's one of my own faults.
    The scene is empty of anyone except the two characters until the barkeep bolts.
    Where Gary stumbles and sprawls is an opportunity to add a few visual and/or sensory details( snicker from near-by tables, smell of the floor)--as well as a slight jack-up of tension by the delay of impending action between the bounty hunter and his bounty.
    The simple fact that it IS a bounty hunter and his bounty makes me expect that things have been too easy and are about to go to hell in a handbasket very soon, so I would read on. Definitely.

    Botanist

    I gave this a "yes" because this sounded like the start of a rollicking good action-packed read.

    I can see what others mean with their comments, especially the "brat" bit, but the part I really stumbled over was the second sentence: Any man with thirty thousand credits on his head would do the same. I was fairly sure on first reading that it referred to the gun on display and that Castor was the one with the price on his head, but I had to read on to rid myself of the alternative: that it was Gary who was wanted, and the sitting-with-back-to-wall-watching-carefully was what any man in that position would do.

    Charlie

    I gave this one the thumbs up even though it is not my genre of choice. You got me intrigued and I wanted to read more and that is coming from someone who is normally put off instantly by anything that relates to futuristic space travel, laser swords, magic spells or talking trees. In other words not a big fan of Sci-Fi or Fantasy. So well done!

    What I didn't like was "brat". Show me what you mean by brat instead because my guess is that "brat" is interpreted very differently by different readers.

    Christine H

    I agree with Bernita that this is a little too lean. Although I think I've seen this before, haven't I?

    I love the vanity gene-splicing. Nice detail with the fang.

    I had to read it a second time to figure out that Gary was faking drunkenness.

    Sixteen lines is a really, really tough limit to work with. You got a thumbs-up from Ray which is quite an accomplishment!

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Working...
    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

    Working...

    Post a comment