My Photo

Sites to See

February 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      
Blog powered by TypePad

.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    « Friday Fun and Flogometer for Susan—would you turn the page? | Main | Flogometer for MZ—would you turn the page? »

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83453034869e20133f1880a17970b

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Flogometer for Liz—would you turn the page?:

    Comments

    Doug

    Prologue:

    Not quite. Content-wise, there was a bit too much water detail and not enough story detail. But the writing was the main thing that put me off.

    Participial phrases are being used to do the work of verbs, when they're adjectives. Some example fixes:
    - Chax grimaced and licked at the stray moisture, but it eluded him. It slithered across his forehead, trailed wet kisses in the crease of his face, and pooled beneath his chin.

    I didn't understand the "*If* he turned his head." This sounds like he didn't turn his head, but the next sentence suggests that he did.

    "A nice change of pace" does not (in my opinion) gain anything by being a sentence fragment. Also, the word "nice" doesn't seem appropriate in this context.

    The simile in "His damp shirt clung to him like a sodden rag" seemed redundant. I think that most of us could better imagine the clinging of a damp shirt than the clinging of a sodden rag, and a damp shirt isn't all that different from a sodden rag, anyway.

    When I got to the part about his wings being spread out, I got confused. The earlier descriptions, of dripping water running across his forehead and of getting the water to hit the back of his neck by turning his head, suggested to me that he was lying on his side. I can't reconcile the two positions.

    I don't think the word "Instead" adds anything to the sentence about his wings being stretched out.

    "The wings" probably should be "His wings". The phrase "type of position" could be shortened to simply "position". A tympani is a drum, so "tympani drum" is redundant. And again, "the muscles" probably should be "his muscles".

    The next paragraph is a jumble of sentence subjects. We start out with Chax's wings, switch to Chax, then to his captors, and the pronouns get lost in the mix. That paragraph also contains two uses of "could", and the second one is pretty clearly superfluous. The comma after "pain" doesn't belong there.

    The final paragraph on the page doesn't seem to add anything.

    The scene certainly raises the story questions of who Chax is, who his captors are, and why he's being held. But the writing doesn't draw that out as well as it could. Besides, it's a prologue and probably will be skipped by many readers.

    Doug

    Chapter 1:

    Opening with unattributed dialogue. That earned an immediate "no" from me.

    In the second paragraph, "expect" should be "except".

    In Azrael's line, "Do we really understand them", who's "them"? Nothing plural has been mentioned.

    Gyas's response should use commas rather than periods.

    Point-of-view seems to be all over the place. From the opening it seems that we're in Gyas's PoV, but in the fifth paragraph we're clearly in Azrael's PoV, in the next paragraph it seems we're back in Gyas's PoV, in the paragraph after that we're obviously back in Azrael's PoV, and the final paragraph on the page seems to be in Gyas's PoV.

    If you're going for third-person omniscient, you really need to introduce your narrator at the beginning and let him/her start telling the story. That way we know what's going on.

    Gyas's explanation of rogues in the sixth paragraph is completely disorienting.

    By the end of the page, I was thoroughly confused rather than intrigued.

    Kelly

    Doug: never correct grammar in dialogue unless it's complete gibberish or the character speaking is an English teacher. And the PoV flowed quite clearly for me, but then again, I've read quite a bit of omniscient (which does not always require an intrusive, clearly visible narrator).

    Tamara

    The prologue was interesting enough, and I agree with Ray's comments. What is nice about the prologue is it's a scene, easy to see.

    The chapter opening, however, was difficult for me to read. All the odd names and terms were taxing on my brain. Also, it feels like exposition changed into a scene by splitting it into dialogue and adding tension. I know Donald Maass recommends doing this, but this reader prefers her exposition undisguised.

    Ray Rhamey

    As to POV: in the chapter opening, we are clearly in Azrael's point of view, and there's NOTHING to suggest differently. It is not omniscient,but close third person. Examine it more carefully. There are Azreal's internal monologue bits that clearly place the point of view as his.

    Jeannie

    There is definitely potential and I find the angel in chains very curious. But the interesting part to me never really revealed.

    In the first paragraph, water has the leading role. It slaps, slithers, and kisses. I want an immediate understanding of his situation, and this seems light-hearted. The guy is chained up and being held captive, yet he's trying to evade water drops. There's a story here -- but I'm confused about how he feels about being held captive.

    For the first chapter, it's asking me to immediately delve into a world I don't yet care about. I need to connect to the characters first.

    Ryan. W

    I don't know why anyone hasn't pointed this out yet. But every paragraph begins with Gyas or Azrael, excluding the unattributed dialogue in the opening.

    The Prologue however did intrigue me, so I gave this a 'yes', though, a 'no' is given to the first chapter.

    I couldn't really understand what was being described on the 6th paragraph either, I think I got myself lost in quite the maze.

    Now, I'm not a very experienced writer, but I don't think it's very hard to point out obvious flaws. Especially ones that I make on my own.

    Ryan

    Marcel

    Despite an intriguing set-up (a guy with wings tied up), I voted no for both. The prologue seems overwritten to me (the slapping, slithering, kissing, etc). Plus, as mentioned, there is no tension in what could/should be a tension filled situation.

    The first chapter seemed like exposition disguised as dialogue. I didn't buy that the student who asked the question didn't already know part or the entire answer given by the teacher.

    The beats (the shrugging, nodding, scowling and hesitating) all suggest omniscient POV to me. If this were close 3rd person, then one of the characters should already have become a "he" instead of continually being referred to as Azreal or Gyas to open paragraphs. That's the clearest indication that this is likely omniscient. Although as you point out Ray, everything else on the page seems to be Azreal's internal monologue (although that's debatable as it's confusing since I'm not anchored to who is who really), so to me, it can't be deduced yet that this is close 3rd person. Once one of the characters becomes a "he", then I'll feel anchored to POV. Right now, I'm with Doug and Kelly that this appears to be omniscient POV (ie. the evidence is stronger for that case).

    Liz, the prologue is intriguing (and contrary to what Doug says, readers read prologues--agent Nathan Bransford had an informal poll on this recently, and the vast majority of writers and readers who surf his website said they do read them). I suggest inserting more tension to it. What are the stakes for Chax? Make the reader care right away what happens to him.

    I'm unsure what to suggest for chapter 1. It seems that you may be beginning the story too soon (which is my generic reply when stories begin with background and exposition).

    Good luck with it. Like I said, I like the premise.

    Liz P

    Thanks for the suggestions, everyone.

    I did some reworking with the advice. Clearly, I waited too long for the tension in the prologue to show up. And too much water. lol. So I cut and adjusted so I mentioned the danger/tension more quickly.

    Ch. 1 I also reworked, to move the important info (about rogues) to a later place. So far as using their names, I originally had "he" here and there, but I was told it was too confusing. Since Gyas andn Azrael (and soon, Gethon) are all male, so "he" was too generic to be clear who was who.

    Hmm. I'll see if I can improve that, without making it unclear who is involved.

    Doug

    Ray, you might have seen the first page of Chapter 1 as clearly being in Azrael's PoV, but I didn't.

    There's no question that paragraphs 5 and 7 are in close third-person with Azrael. But there are other parts that seem to be from Gyas's PoV, and that's why I thought this seemed omniscient.

    1: The first person mentioned in the chapter is Gyas. This is a hint that Gyas *might* be the PoV character. By itself, this is nothing.

    2: In paragraph 2, "His sigh would have been a sharp rebuke" seems to be from Gyas's PoV, which would confirm the hint.

    3: In paragraph 6, "Gyas scowled at his silence", and only Gyas would know why he scowled.

    4: In paragraph 8 (the final paragraph), "Gyas swore under his breath," something that only Gyas would know.

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Working...
    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

    Working...

    Post a comment