My Photo

Sites to See

July 2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Blog powered by TypePad

.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    « Flogometer for Margo—would you turn the page? | Main | Flogometer for CA—would you turn the page? »

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83453034869e20120a8f20052970b

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Flogometer for Phil—would you turn the page?:

    Comments

    Lexi Revellian

    The first paragraph has SEVEN sentences beginning with 'I'.

    I felt this extract was dodging about all over the place, maybe trying too hard.

    (I bike in February. All year, in fact, though I go to work on the bike rather than round in circles. Made me think the narrator's a wimp, which is not good.)

    Aimee Laine

    I said 'yes' because I'm intrigued by what happened and wanted to know more, but I admit that there is duplication and retelling of the same thing over and over (<-- see?) So from a writing perspective, I felt like I didn't get very far in the words that were presented to me. I wanted to know more, yes, but in fewer words. Good luck!

    TamaraL

    I sense there's a good story coming, but I have to agree with Ray's comments.

    It fits with Ray's "story as river" example.

    Do give it another shot. Your thoughts seem well-organized and poised for something great.

    Renee Yancy

    It had me for the first 6 lines. Then I thought it trailed off somewhat with too much backstory. I was ready to hear about what the trouble was after line 6 and thought that those sentences gave a great lead in for that.

    After that I lost some interest although I still wanted to know what the Great Calamity was.

    Jean

    I wish this story had started when the trouble starts as I like the ideas hinted at here, but currently too much backstory prevents me from wanting to read further. The previously mentioned issue of all the 'I' in the first paragraph is also a deterrent

    Marcel

    I have to second what some have said. There seems to be a good story here (I like the idea of a wimpy guy who can't avoid trouble--tells me that, eventually, trouble will change him as a character). The Great Calamity had a hook in me too. So did the voice. It's the execution that didn't work. Maybe the answer is a scene. I'd like to see this character moving and seeing the aftermath of the Great Calamity as he bikes around the city.

    Cardiologist Murray Levine that is, the man who saved my life.

    This fragment made no sense to me. It seemed unattached or didn't seem to have a point.

    Good luck with the story. There's something there.

    Doug

    For me, I'd cut the first paragraph entirely.

    The first sentence of the second paragraph isn't a half-bad opening line, although it's written as reminiscence (backstory). A better construction might be, "I was biking my seven laps around what remained of Prospect Park, Brooklyn, when my history caught up with me."

    After that, though, it's all downhill. Two sentences later you directly address the reader--not usually a good idea--and then the reminiscent backstory (was biking) takes us to back-backstory (not that long ago) and then to back-back-backstory (had become hazardous).

    Nothing more is said about the trouble mentioned in the first paragraph, and nothing more is said about how history caught up with the protagonist--unless he's about to collapse from another heart attack, which I doubt. Those were the two interesting points, but nothing came of them. It's bait-and-switch writing, and agents don't like being tricked. (Most readers don't, either.)

    At the beginning of your story, you should try to give the readers questions, not answers. Build questions on questions, if you can. Make the readers turn the page to try to find out what's going on, and what happens next.

    One rule of thumb is to move relentlessly forward in "story time" for at least the first two scenes. Then you can start slipping in a bit of backstory. In those first two scenes, you can use an occasional phrase or description that fills in a bit of backstory, but each sentence should occur in a time frame that is after the preceding sentence.

    jon

    Short comments so I can catch up with the backlog, sorry.

    This was a No for me, sorry. Promising first paragraph, but it rambled and rambled and I was afraid it was going to keep doing that for 200 pages :o). Lots of nice little hints at hooks, but it was kinda like trying to land a great white with tackle built for trout. I _wanted_ to care about this character, but, sadly, didn't.

    Very decent writing, though. "Properly" focused, this has potential. Good luck! Thanks for sharing!

    -j


    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Working...
    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

    Working...

    Post a comment