My Photo

Sites to See

June 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Blog powered by TypePad

.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    « Flogometer for Ana—would you turn the page? | Main | We pause for a brief commercial message—and appeal for help + video! »

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83453034869e20120a7fce5d4970b

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Flogometer for David—would you turn the page?:

    Comments

    Christine H

    Another thought: Instead of telling us the serving girls avoided him, perhaps you could show him trying to get the attention of one who used to be friendly to him. That would inject some dialogue into the scene and bring it to life a little. Just a thought.

    Sheila

    I was hooked by the first line. Just by saying, "Tosk didn’t want trouble," I know that trouble is coming his way. The problem, for me, was that it didn't come fast enough. The only hint of trouble was that the serving girl was ignoring him.

    And then I read Ray's edit and saw the mention of the three guys, and that perked me up. I think you need to get to them sooner.

    But, overall, very interesting start. Good luck!

    Nicola

    Hey, you gotta love it when someone uses a semi-colon correctly - and in the first sentence no less! Thanks for that! I voted to turn the page because it's very clear that the author of this piece knows the mechanics of writing and can tell a story. Everything else can be worked on. I agree with the few problems raised by other commenters. What is the deal with that mug? Who exactly is the protagonist? But there's a lot to work with here. Well done.

    Trip Volpe

    I agree with Jon that your premise has promise! Tosk the alcoholic fantasy-dweller seems a very human character whom I'd like to know more about.

    And like others, I loved that opening line. But for me, it started to drag down immediately after the second sentence. Most of the first paragraph really felt like overwriting to me. It starts with "Not even a drop," continues when Tosk glowers at the mug, and reaches something of a climax when he imagines that squeezing it might fill it with ale. That just seemed like a strange thing to do, and it made it hard to stay in the story.

    And for all the words that are focused on the mug, I still don't have a very clear picture of it, aside from the fact that it is made of bone and has markings on it. Are the markings important? If so, I think a bit more description would be necessary. If not, I'd just leave them out entirely.

    So in the first paragraph, I'd probably cut everything but the first, second, and last sentences. (The last sentence with tweaks that others have covered pretty well.)

    Things pick up a little more after that, though; we get an interesting introduction to this guy's problems, with just enough hints of a bigger picture to keep me wondering what happens next. I think this should be immediately capitalized on by bringing in the "trouble" he hoped to avoid in the first sentence. Get that started on the first page and you could definitely consider my interest thoroughly captured.

    David

    Some very good ideas here. I can certainly move up the part about the three men. They play a larger part later in the chapter, so introducing them a little earlier shouldn't be hard. Showing rather than telling on the serving girls part is a great idea.

    One of my concerns is spelling out this a little too much about Tosk's condition rather than revealing it through hints and clues. For example, I could change the first couple paragraphs to something like this:

    "Tosk didn’t want trouble; he just wanted more ale before he died. Trouble took the form of three rough-looking men at the bar who cast suspicious glances in his direction. He knew it wouldn’t be long before they recognized him. He also knew that soon after that they would summon the courage to confront him. But he had other concerns, so for now he ignored them.

    Instead he focused his attention on the bone mug from which he always drank, the last reminder of what he once was. It sat empty on the table before him, not even a drop of warm, dark brew still moistened its surface. He cursed his lack of drink for depriving him of the courage to end his suffering. A stronger man would have already killed himself, but he ceased being such a man long ago.

    The pain of his sobriety pounded his head with the force of a blacksmith’s hammer..."

    This text does remove some of the focus from the mug (not sure I want to do that too much for reasons that come up later), and introduces the threat of the men earlier. Not sure if this works better or not (as Trip said, removing one or two of the sentences in the intro paragraph is an appealing alternative as well), but it's given me something to think about.

    Trip Volpe

    Well, don't feel like you _have_ to bring it in immediately after the first sentence just to appease us, either. :-)

    I think your original structure worked well -- it just had a bit of overwriting and a few details that divided the reader's attention. Trimming that down might allow you to hint at the trouble with the three men near the end of the first page, which would be just about right IMHO.

    Jon

    I like the new version a LOT, David (though I still don't like "from which he always drank" for reasons that I don't fully understand and can't explain.

    I particularly liked the "last reminder of..." bit, which provided a nice background-mystery hook.

    -j

    Sheila

    I also really like the new version. Well done.

    Gumption Brash

    Well, I liked the first version a lot. The second one threw me a little due to pacing.

    As Trip Volpe says, don't bring the instance with the men up too far just to appease us.

    I'd say your first version, with the addition of the three men as the last line, would work very well.

    Aside from that, the only issue I had with your revisement was with clarity at one point:

    'not even a drop of warm, dark brew still moistened its surface.'

    The brew, typically, wouldn't moisten the surface, but the inside of the mug.

    'not a drop of warm, dark brew moistened its depths.'

    Oh, and lastly, if the mug is important - why not keep the same focus on it that you had? The reader might not understand the reasoning immediately, but if you have a plan why not stick to it?

    David

    Thanks for the suggestions. I am still planning on using my original opening with some of the key tweaks mentioned here, but I enjoy trying out different approaches to see what works.

    Thanks to Ray and everyone who posted here--it's been quite helpful.

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Working...
    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

    Working...

    Post a comment