My Photo

Sites to See

July 2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Blog powered by TypePad

.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    « Flogometer for Donna--would you turn the page? | Main | Flogometer for Brooke--would you turn the page? »

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83453034869e20120a6fd8a55970b

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Flogometer for Jami--would you turn the page?:

    Comments

    Chris

    For me, there was enough here to get the page turned. The immediacy of the action within the scene, the emotional stakes, and the quirky story questions led me to want to wade further in.

    The writing is good, but could definitely stand some pruning and maybe some different word choices, as Ray points out. For instance, I had no problem with the "blood-splattered" shirt, since I envisioned a slash from the switch-blade causing blood to spray from the cut -- the "rip". Aside from Ray's keen observation that a stab into the heart is what you'd expect to lead to death, the word choice of 'sat' seems odd and too passive, even if a slashing switchblade across the chest could kill.

    The insertion of the thought towards Renaldo was an interesting quirk that helped me turn the page. But it does lack clarity as to what Daniel's doing. I took it as him imagining what he would say to Renaldo at some point later in the story, not that it was an attempt at communication then and there.

    However, the next paragraph is one that made me a little less enthused about turning the page. I want to see what's going to happen in the story, but this is maybe getting a little too melodramatic for me. The inner question that the events might "destroy his hopes for the future" is both too overly dramatic and too vague at the same time. It tries to make the events seem all-important, as if I can't figure out that accidently killing someone he knew will have serious ramifications. Yet it tells me nothing. What hopes? What future? Be more concrete or leave it out all togetehr. Then making him strong enough to "refuse to think about it", yet still keeping him so weak that he remains "paralyzed in his collapsed position" is awkward and hints that the writer doesn't have a frim grasp on the inner workings of the characters and the events being portrayed.

    All in all, this is a solid start and hints at a very interesting story. You got me to turn the page, but I'd recommend tightening up the writing. Keep only what is needed, and be as clear, concise, and selective as possible in the words you choose to put on the page. I think you have a good beginning -- some polish will make it great.

    Jami G.

    Ray & Chris,

    Thank you so much for the feedback. Yes, it's very hard for me to catch this type of overwriting. I tend to type out actions as I see that movie in my mind and I don't always summarize what isn't important. :) I try, but there's always room for improvement. I also appreciate you both pointing out how I can make the mental communication aspect clearer.

    Thanks!
    Jami G.

    Lexi Revellian

    I was in puzzled mode through most of this. At first I leaped to the conclusion that this was (because of the circus-type names) a knife-throwing act that had gone wrong.

    At, 'I didn't know it was you,' I assumed an unfortunate accident.

    But then when Daniel seems to think Demetri can fix it, I gathered this was a paranormal tale. I like to know what is going on in a novel, and don't want to work too hard to find out.

    Doug

    I voted yes, but barely. Like Lexi, I was quite confused about what was going on, and I wasn't sure I wanted to try to puzzle it out.

    My usual whine: here's another "body on page 1", and essentially on line 1. I know that it can be effective, but for me it reflects a certain lack of creativity. It's hard to avoid it in a police procedural, but this doesn't seem to be one. (Note: my own attempt at avoiding body on page 1 left a sizeable crater here a few weeks ago due to "stakes too low", so I know it's not easy.)

    In addition to Ray's comments, I think that "crimson" is enough without the adjective "dark". I also initially didn't understand how one could "slump" back onto one's heels from a kneeling position; I envisioned him rising to a crouch. Maybe "slumped back to sit on his heels" might be more clear. Or maybe I'm just dense.

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Working...
    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

    Working...

    Post a comment