My Photo

Sites to See

March 2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
Blog powered by TypePad

.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    « Plot structure tutorial from Joe Nassise | Main | Flogometer for Vaughn—would you turn the page? »

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83453034869e20120a69271e5970c

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Flogometer for M.Z.—would you turn the page?:

    Comments

    Doug

    I thought that both worked, although I like Ray's a bit better. M.Z.'s original relies on suspense, Ray's relies on action, and either way is fine with me. I'd rather the suspense not be based so much on windowpane description, though.

    The biggest problem I had was the original first line. At first I thought it was going to be an advertisement for Dristan sinus headache medicine. That's an unfortunate choice of name for the character, and to start off with him having a headache was a miscalculation (in my opinion).

    I'm not sure how taste buds shiver.

    A pang is a brief sensation, but the "jittery pang" apparently continued.

    Lexi Revellian

    I had problems with the first sentence, as I paused to wonder whether the small beast was equipped with a tiny hammer...

    I liked Ray's version.

    Q of D

    The second version (Ray's) did nothing for me. It's just a long list of action after action. The original had much more depth.

    I think this is a writer with a strong voice and I hope he/she does not allow an editor to hack their work to bits when a simple clean up is all that should be done.

    I would definitely reduce the -ing words in the first paragraph. I counted five in the first two sentences. But that's an easy fix.

    I think the suggested revision of putting the fat man up front in the first sentence weakens the opening.

    Unfortunately I have to agree with the Dristan/headache/sinus connection. Not the image the author likely wanted to project.

    I would have turned the page as originally written. Good work, MZ!

    Christine H

    I agree with Q of D about the second version.

    I didn't vote to turn on the first version, either, however. I don't know why, and I'm sorry I can't be more specific.

    I think it reminded me of another market scene that was posted here a couple of months ago. It seemed a bit cliche'd - like Indiana Jones, even though I'm sure that there's an interesting story behind it.

    Tell me first WHY Dristan is following the man. Is Dristan an assassin? If so, why should I care about him? Is the bald man some sort of terrorist whom he is trying to stop? What are the stakes here?

    And why is his head hurting so much? Did he just get knocked on the head, and then struggle to his feet, determined to complete his mission? If so, that seems like a more interesting place to begin.

    Just some ideas. I think you have the makings of a good story, it needs a little tweaking. In my humble, unpublished, opinion.

    Kami

    I liked the first version just fine. Only a couple of things threw me out. A pulsating crowd I normally associate with dancing. Um ...? I need to hear/feel the music before I can buy into that.
    There are other word choices, like abandoned (which Ray also pointed out as well as pulsating) that made me wonder what the author was really trying to convey.

    But I like the depth of the first version. I'm the kind of reader that needs lots of setting. I liked what Saladore implied (hopefully rightfully--again, be careful with words) as far as a kind of Spanish or possibly midde-eastern-ish or both kind of place. If it's a real place, well, hopefully it's a place like that because otherwise I'm a bit lost.

    Marcel

    I'm with Ray on this one. The first version did nothing for me (I had to force myself past the first sentence). The writing appeared guided by an amalgam of "how to" books. There is a plethora of "power" words in this opening, so many that, to me, it appeared this piece was more about prose (which was only so-so anyway), moreso than telling a story. Ray's example tells a story where the writing doesn't get in the way. And the first version, although peculiar in style, had a generic voice. Although Ray's example doesn't have much voice either, it's well-written (he sure knows how to write an action scene) and smooth. The chronology of events builds a tension the first one hid behind word choices.

    If this is somehow adventure or thriller, Ray's version would give you a good building block to edit this opening.

    Good luck. It sounds like a good beginning.

    disorderly

    I liked Ray's more quickly paced, action-oriented version, although I believe M.Z.'s original could be tightened and do quite well on suspense, if that's the direction M.Z. wants to go.

    My bigger problem was the POV character's name. "Dristan" is an over-the-counter sinus medication, and try though I might, I could not get around that association. Unless the character is so named because he is beset by allergies, I wonder if spelling his moniker "Dristin" or "Dristen" or something similar might be an option.

    hope101

    I much prefer the second version, but I'd be okay with the first, if it was tightened.

    If you think of the POV as camera lens, the first starts off in quite deep third, pulls back to distant third, goes deeper, pulls back, etc. That change in focus makes me as dizzy reading as when I watch TV and they pull this technique. (Can you tell I'm not a member of the MTV generation?) I'm okay if the voice starts omniscient, as long as it moves deeper consistently and quickly into action.

    In particular, I can't see that the fourth paragraph adding anything we needed to know, other than he is hungry. That could easily be worked in as a possible cause of his headache in the first paragraph.

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Working...
    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

    Working...

    Post a comment