My Photo

Sites to See

June 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Blog powered by TypePad

.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    « Anniversary--#500, 5 years, plus Flogometer for Rayne | Main | Flogometer for Derek—would you turn the page? »

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83453034869e20120a56c1dcd970b

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Flogometer for Christine—would you turn the page?:

    Comments

    Jessica

    In my order of preference: 3, 1, 2.

    I loved the worldbuilding in 1, but thought that the tension in 3 really moved the story along. I agreed with Ray that the writing is solid, crisp, and clear, and it sounds like an excellent story!

    Jessica

    Maya

    Can I do one little bit of nitpicking? I'd remove the comma after the word "neat" in the first version. Otherwise, I loved the way it explained just enough yet started to draw me into a mystery. I also felt the fact that the threat of nightstalkers was increasing compelled me to turn the page. The third version, to me, starts out with too much action-- I don't care enough yet to follow along so quickly.

    Great writing, though!

    kathy

    Page one for me. I enjoyed the build up.
    I wouldn't change a thing.

    C.L.

    I think the third was by far the best for page turning. Both of the previous version had a little too much set-up. It felt like an info-dump. The writing was good, but you're sitting there thinking "Get on with it." The story, however, intrigues me.

    lexi Revellian

    I rather liked the second version - though I did wonder about the elegance of Harth. At first I assumed Harth was an attractive female, maybe the love interest, until I got to 'his'. Because we were in Faldur's POV, I then thought for a moment that he might be gay.

    Christine H

    Lexi - LOL!!!

    Christine H

    Maya, I agree with you on the comma.

    In general, the problem has been that my test readers get really confused with versions 1 and 3. They say, "What's a nighstalker? Who are these people? Where is this taking place? I'm so confused."

    The writers, on the other hand, label any attempt at conveying this kind of information as an "infodump."

    So I feel caught between a rock and a hard place, and value everyone's feedback.

    One question for you all: If the book started with Version 3, would you expect non-stop action all the way through?

    Ann (bunnygirl)

    I actually liked the first version first. The third threw too many names at me too quickly for my taste.

    If you start the action a little sooner in #1, I think you'll have it, like after “You’d best go inside, and keep your doors and shutters bolted,” segue into #3.

    Andy

    #2 OK #3 best.Stay with it Christine.I'm waiting for the rest. Andy.

    Marcel

    Can one be lean AND compact? Can't picture this.

    I liked number three the best because it was an actual scene.

    The first option eventually became a scene, but you had to stick with a squatting farmhouse before you got there (I know the word is used correctly, but the construction of the sentence gave it a different connotation to me and I couldn't distance myself from my first opinion). And the rest of the information presented in the first paragraph actually is re-presented in a different way during the scene. I'd go straight to the second paragraph if you choose that one.

    The second had no grab whatsoever to me--the first paragraph read like a history book.

    My biggest problem was that I had no idea why these guys were tracking this panther, and therefore, I couldn't rate the stakes. If for example, the panther had mauled a kid, the guy's wife, etc, then that would have drawn me in right away. Livestock, well, not as much. Not knowing what the stakes are, I'm still not sure I turn the page despite some pretty good writing. Keep at it. It's close to being there.

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Working...
    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

    Working...

    Post a comment