My Photo

Sites to See

June 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Blog powered by TypePad

.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    « Flogometer for Sheri. Would you turn the page? | Main | Flogometer for Tom (again). Would you turn the page? »

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83453034869e201156eb734f5970c

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Flogometer for Tom. Would you turn the page?:

    Comments

    hope101

    I've read nothing set in this particular location and time period, so that definitely intrigued me. Also, the writing itself is clear.

    But I have to agree with Ray that I feel very distant from the main character. Put me in his head. Let me feel the sweat trickling down his back, how he checks himself for any signs of the asthma that might flare just when he needs to run.

    Also, this may be my own particular preference, but I'm not fond of present tense in writing unless the work is written in first person. Even then, it has to be an engaging character for me to get over it.

    Good luck!

    Kami

    Although the setting sounds like a winner, this opening felt like it had been compressed for maximum density. This sentence stood out in particular:
    But there is no escape from the terminal agonies of a lost colonial cause, at a time when all white men must serve, regardless of age or infirmity.
    There is a ton of information/meaning in there, too much for me to process in the time that it takes to read that sentence.

    I had to reread just about every sentence in this section as I went along, and then the whole opening again all at once, to make sure I hadn't missed anything (and I had in fact missed a lot of things on the first pass.) Having each sentence make grammatical sense isn't enough. It has to provide just the right amount of information--not too much, not too little. These provide too much, at least for me.

    Going closer into pov will probably reduce informational density at the same time. Having said that, all the usual applies--everyone's tastes are different, and it may be that for a particular audience, this style of writing may work beautifully.

    Good luck!

    Timberati

    I agree that the writing is clear. I too found its distant, almost clinical, POV off-putting. "Steve Stevens stands alone on the moonlit veld..."

    That distance also came off as "telling." “Don't tell me the moon is shining; show me the glint of light on broken glass.” - Anton Chekhov

    To close the distance, you might try writing in the first-person "I," see how that feels, and get into the character's head a while. Then you can pull back, if you want a third-person POV as the narrative voice.

    Good luck.

    Christine H

    I would drop the second paragraph completely, and focus on Steve and the light. I didn't understand what the issue was until Ray said it was a ghost. When I read it, I thought the light was a signal to Steve from one of his comrades, telling him that the coast was clear for him to go forward and fulfill X task, and he was working up the nerve to do X.

    Just my two cents.

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Working...
    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

    Working...

    Post a comment