My Photo

Sites to See

June 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Blog powered by TypePad

.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    « Flogometer for Patrick: would you keep reading? | Main | Flogometer for Kami: would you keep reading? »

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83453034869e20105364fbfae970b

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Flogometer for Stu: would you keep reading? :

    Comments

    Jessica

    I liked the imagery and setting. It put me right in the middle of the action, and I could sense the entire scene in three dimensions. I thought there was a little overwriting (too many adjectives), but that's easily smoothed out. At the same time, I found myself starting to skip over text, wondering whether the entire book was going to be told from a hyena's point of view. This is an issue of my taste, rather than of writing quality. All the same, I'd be hesitant to buy an entire book if I thought it was going to read like an episode of "Nature." If there's human conflict, I'd prefer to see it by the second paragraph. If they book is told from the hyena's point of view, you might still consider putting the threat earlier on, perhaps explaining how the hyena came to associate the smells of man and death.

    I thought the writing was solid and well crafted. I'm very curious to see where this is going.

    Kami

    I also thought the writing was solid, aside from a few minor quibbles. Unfortunately I wouldn't have read on either. There's some repetition--rehashing the thinness, the desperate straits, the scent of death--and there's hyena backstory with digging out a den, and discussion of hyena instinct. That's not necessary to the story, is it? I'd like to get to the people sooner, please.

    Theadra Leilani

    I liked the writing style, the voice, but not the point of view. I've read a few other books that let me see from the eyes of an animal, so I'm not opposed to that. The length of it, though, loses me. Animals are very much in the here and now. Squirrels don't bury nuts because they're worried about winter and having enough to eat, they bury nuts because that's what they need to do right now. From an animal point of view, this is dragging.

    My suggestion (I tried to keep as many of the original words in the cut version as I could.)

    The scent of spilled blood flowed through the chilled night air across the sands of the desert. The Striped Hyena raised his snout towards the narrow light of the moon. His nostrils wrinkled and he glanced back to the female loping some distance behind him. She needed food or he'd be alone. No mate, no offspring. The rumbling of his stomach made up his mind. Staying in the shadow of a large mountain, the Hyena raised his head again. The smell was stronger, closer, yet he knew it was not truly of death. It was the odor of man. He moved forward with caution, the female followed.

    Deana

    First it's the scent of death, then it's confirmed, then we find out it isn't really the scent of death after all, just stinky old man.

    Well, if you're aiming for some kind of overly dramatic Discovery Hyena Saga, with a good bit of "humans suck" thrown in, you're probably on the right track.

    Dan

    Leaving aside the issue of whether this is a story about hyenas or people, the opening needs trimming as suggested by Ray and others.Overwriting is a problem I share with the writer. I suggest he eliminate adjectives, adverbs and any phrases with a hint of redundancy.

    Jon

    Almost-but-no, from me. Or maybe yes. It's right on that 51-49 cusp.

    On the plus side, the writing is confident. The verbs are active, the images strong, the problem compelling. All very good things - the 51%. Or 49%. :)


    Weakening the piece is the over-reliance in adjectives; virtually every noun has one. Prepositional phrases also predominate. The result is a ponderous read.

    Cutting out half the adjectives and condensing some of the prep phrases, we might end up with a first paragraph something like this:

    Death's scent flowed through the night, across the desert sands. The striped hyena raised his snout towards the quarter-moon's narrow light. His nostrils wrinkled in confirmation and he glanced back to the female loping some distance behind him. She was tired, weakened by the additional burden of her imminent litter. Striped fur and skin draped from their bones, hunger-loosened now [that] their prey had been driven away by the drying-up of the desert's wadis.


    It could still use some work, but it's tighter stripped of some of the prep phrases and adjectives, no?


    One other factor, seemingly silly but offputting, was the capitalization. Nouns are nouns; capitalizing them seemingly at random made the piece feel a bit like a 17th century travelogue.


    And as a side note, the third paragraph kind of recants the strong image in the first line - if the critter smells death, let it be the smell of death. Backing off from that makes the first paragraph feel like a false promise.


    Good luck with this one! It's not far off, even if it was a no from me as-is.

    Jodi

    If this is animal fiction about hyenas and the like, I'd read on. If it is just some sorta set up or prelude to a story about humans, I wouldn't.

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Working...
    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

    Working...

    Post a comment