My Photo

Sites to See

June 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Blog powered by TypePad

.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    « Flogometer for Jeanne: would you keep reading? | Main | Flogometer for Trudy: would you keep reading? »

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83453034869e201053680964a970b

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Flogometer for Lorraine: would you keep reading?:

    Comments

    Julie Butcher-Fedynich

    The prologur is great, although I'd love it more if you started it with the part about already seeing her own death.

    The first chapter had POV issues to me. How did she know her face darkened? Does she consider herself young? (Most people don't think of themselves as young, not even as teenagers)

    "Sooner than Aiden could dismount to soothe ruffled feelings, the Young Baron unbound his feet and rose from the ground" This sentence either wasn't clear enough, or was too long, it lost me

    Over all it looks like an interesting read.

    Julie

    MCD

    I'm along for the ride, and the Aiden/Maia/Baron Rendall interaction had me ready to read on, although the craft issues would have stopped me if I'd picked this up in a book store. Still, I think those are more easily addressed than a poor story, so you're in good shape.

    By the way, I thought the first chapter was stronger than the prologue (I seem to be in a minority there). A few things I noted there:

    Watch out for using dialogue to explain things that should be narrated (i.e. "I know how seer stones work. Anything that's hidden ...") That seemed directed to the reader more than the seer, and felt clunky.

    Also, a small thing, perhaps, but watch for cases of repetition. They can weaken the scene. For example: "His presence unnerved her." I thought this was a) a definite understatement and b) an example of telling rather than showing and c) already established and therefore unnecessary.

    Hope this helps. I enjoyed the piece, and hope you keep going!

    Norm

    I liked the prologue. My hangup came with the seer having seen her own death. She will have seen her other tribulations and will know whether she will see tomorrow or not. The sentence that she had seen her own death put me into a loop of fruitless questions. Does she know the what but not the when? Otherwise, why does she tremble?

    I didn't think "He snarled at the woman." was necessary and would have like him to do something, such as hit her or overturn a table. I think stage action would have showed me. "Snarled" told me something I already knew from the the previous sentence.

    Setting those 'pickies' aside, I liked the writing in the prologue.

    Don Felipe de Santa Rosa

    As a reader who bears disdain for the fantasy genre, I confess I voted yes for both pieces for the first time since visiting FTQ. Perhaps some hyperbole but an intriguing entry; I wanted more. I will leave the craft critique to Ray and sufice it to say bravo, good writing!

    Alyssa

    The Prologue really caught me. It is a great way to bring you into the book.
    When it says "Sooner than Aiden could dismount to soothe ruffled feelings, the Young Baron unbound his feet and rose from the ground" you should be more clear about whose feelings you are talking about. I also sugest that you use a different word other than "ruffled" it seems mild for the way she was acting.
    Great writing though! It really paints a strong picture in my mind. I like it how you are being discriptive without being too wordy.

    Jodi

    I had a hard time visualizing this, which is why I got pulled out of what seemed like an interesting story. The prologue starts with the main character of the scene staring down at a crystal in her lap, then her voice shakes as she addresses her oppressor. The way it was worded made me think I missed the fact that the oppressor was already there from the get-go. Same with the opening of chapter one. I didn't understand what was going on. I understood the noble was whipped, but then I had to slow down and backtrack to realize whom was whipping whom, where the noble was (in relation to his horse), and when he managed to hurt a dog. It just seems like some visuals or facts are coming out of order. Otherwise, it's interesting. I always liked seers and I like this line: "One of the hazards of being a seer is the 'seeing', and she had already seen her death."

    Jon

    Close, but ultimately no, for me. Very close, though.

    For me, the first "no" was a craft "no"; the second "no" was a story "no."

    While the word choices, phrasing, flow, etc., were pretty good in the prologue, the first paragraph tried to do a little too much. (For my money, I'd cut P1 after "Deception was her only hope." and avoid her motivations; let the reader wonder why she's lying for a while...)

    The second paragraph probably should have been two (one subject per paragraph!)

    The third paragraph told me that she'd been tied up through the first two paragraphs--made me re-evaluate what had been going on and try to re-picture it, particularly since so much had gone on in those two paragraphs.


    In the chapter excerpt, apart from the "crack" opener (this REALLY didn't work for me) (and, btw, nice catch, Ray, re: the whip; I completely missed that on my read) my complaint was mainly character; I got a Real Bad Mary Sue vibe off of it.

    This may be only a personal reaction, and nothing to worry about, but for me the tiny child physically standing up to her elders for Good without fear of consequence didn't quite feel right.

    In one of George Martin's Song of Ice and Fire, we have a lordling in Joffrey who does something similar, but it's for his own (evil) pleasures that he confronts his elders and terrorizes them. I found that believable for a number of reasons.

    For a character to do that for Good, though, implies a background that has imbued them with not only a strong moral code, but the force of will to stand up for that code in circumstances that would be daunting for anyone. It seems to imply a number of things about her family background (noble, self-sacrificing folk who will back their daughter's actions) that seem a bit idealized to this reader.

    The confluence of all, justified (or even accurate) as it may or may not have been, left me feeling like Maia is a perfect kid with a perfect family, which doesn't exist in nature; this set off my Mary Sue alerts.


    So, for me -
    Prologue: story, yes; writing, no;
    Ch1: story, no; writing, yes.

    Good luck with this one!

    Jon

    ...and, re-reading my post and others, I realize that in the FIRST FRICKIN' SENTENCE the words "at her bindings" were present. So I missed -that- one. Can't blame the writer if I can't read. My apologies!

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Working...
    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

    Working...

    Post a comment