My Photo

Sites to See

June 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Blog powered by TypePad

.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    « Flogometer for Scott: would you keep reading? | Main | Flogometer for Lin: would you keep reading? »

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83453034869e2010535114fd9970b

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Flogometer for Richard: would you keep reading?:

    Comments

    Amy Nathan

    A pet peeve of many agents (or so I've read) and perhaps of many readers is a character that is killed at the end of the first chapter. If the author wants him to be the dead guy, that's fine, but then don't write a chapter about him.

    It was obvious to me as well that this was a very preliminary draft. Perhaps had the author gotten to his second or third draft he'd have realized on his own that this was an unnecessary part of the chapter.

    If someone read my first drafts, I'd be horrified. They'd wonder if English was my first language!

    Mai

    Reading through all the had's in the first paragraph was like slogging through thigh-deep mud.

    My PC should groan, but it never does. (If your PC makes strange noises, stop working immediately and call for service, because something's seriously wrong.)

    A man scrunching up his nose isn't an attractive thought. A girl or a rabbit scrunching up a nose is a different matter.

    A man thinking about and then dismissing food that's fallen behind a bookcase -- especially if he thinks it's begun to rot -- is also unattractive.

    Despite the sometimes-awkward writing, there's something to this story. If the writing had been more polished, I'd have turned the page.

    benwah023

    Scanning the first line, I see "Prince...William" and wonder if there's a Harry and a Charles in our future.

    Ditto the above comment on all the "hads."

    I thought the spoiled food comment was potentially interesting, if not employed to its best use. Use it as a descriptive of the smell, but don't have the MC dismiss it. "William nearly gagged on his way to the door. What was that smell? It was awful, like somebody'd left their lunch to rot behind the radiator." But he's thinking this as he pulls open the door.

    I also tripped over your last line: "No mere human, but no run-of-the-mill magical creature either." The next magical creature I encounter will be my first, so this description essentially tells me nothing.

    The monster behind the door is a good start, but trim and tighten to boost the tension.

    Kami

    This is where tastes run really different--I really liked this. I thought the voice had a very distinct tone that made me think of England and formal sensibilities. I'd have the expectation that it would read something like Jonathon Strange and Mr. Norrell if written carefully. Words like 'bin' and the names employed with title (Mr. as opposed to first name basis) suggested this sort of atmosphere, as well as the rhythm of the words.

    Which means I stumbled on the computer, not hard, but I reworked the setting in my head toward a kind of formal, antiquated culture with current technology at its fingertips, something I've enjoyed in the past.

    I also glitched on the shouted--either use the exclamation point and not the shout or use a comma and say shout. I prefer the exclamation point and then an action tag with no shout, personally.

    I am disappointed to learn this character dies. I have a strong dislike for opening chapters where the character dies--we then have to start from square one in Chapter Two, and surprisingly often, the actual pov character is less interesting than the first one. But I wouldn't automatically assume Mr. Williams is done for--this is clearly a horror or dark fantasy and death isn't always permanent.

    Jon

    I voted no, alas.

    (Sorry to have been so long away, btw, for those who got anything from my feedbacking. Work has been crushing me down like a big thing that crushes people down.)

    The thing that entertained me here was "was no run of the mill magical creature." Packed in this line was the idea that there -are- run-of-the-mill magical creatures in Willie's world. It's been done, and well, lately--Jim Butcher and Lilith Saintcrow among the practitioners--but it still tickles me.

    The idea that something as smelly as a very smelly critter (dead, apparently) could be passed off as a sandwich also tickled me.

    Both these things give me a "fun" feeling (as does the groaning computer), divorced from the reality I know. If that's what the writer was going for, I suggest playing it up.

    The big problem I have with this piece is that the character is almost just a name to me.

    Something the writer might try to address this: from the first line, try giving Willie a Want. It can be as small (as the saying goes) as a glass of water, but whatever it is, it would allow us to hope for him to get it, and thus start bonding with him. Frex, Bill's working late. How does he feel about that? What would he rather be doing?

    Note how, in answering those questions, the writer starts building a character from the first moments. William -was- a faceless office drone before he had wants; if he had a date, or a job interview, or friends kept waiting, or a favorite TV show, he's automatically more of a person.

    Good luck with this piece, Richard!

    Deana

    Ray -- would it be less obtrusive to this writer's "voice" to do something like this instead?

    As written:

    'It's open!' he shouted this time, but still the door remained closed.

    Ray changed to:

    'It's open!' The door remained closed.

    How about:

    He shouted, "It's open!" but the door remained closed.

    I know, it's nit-picky but I wonder if once your chopping instinct gets going, it becomes too easy to inadvertently change the original voice?

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Working...
    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

    Working...

    Post a comment