My Photo

Sites to See

June 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Blog powered by TypePad

.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    « Flogometer for Cheri: would you keep reading? | Main | Flogometer for Ann: would you keep reading? »

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83453034869e2010534b20f96970b

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Flogometer for Terri: would you keep reading?:

    Comments

    Jessica

    I'm a huge mystery fan, but neither the prologue nor the first 16 lines of the first chapter grabbed me.

    That segment about Old Man Blueriver, though, gave me the shivers. If the book had started with that, I'd have bought it. In hardcover.

    kathy

    Yes to the prologue. There was just enough information to catch my interest.
    Chapter one contained too much info. Action was what I would have liked at that point.

    Sheila

    I agree with Ray and Jessica, I think the Old Man Blueriver scene was the most compelling. I would say I liked the prologue second best, because it laid out some interesting story questions.

    The DA has a case that is too good to pass up, we're told. But then the crime scene seems run-of-the-mill. Someone was hit on the head and dumped in a well. I think I would have been more compelled if you added a little hint about what makes this case so special to her - is the victim someone important, or the suspect? Why does she think "I can't believe what I'm seeing," as she looks at fairly routine crime scene photos?

    In the prologue, we're in close third person, which I liked. The next chapter steps way back and I'm not sure at first who's perspective we're in. "A decent enough girl, she had never appeared on one of Malloy's dockets as a defendant" - that sentence made me wonder if we were back in Malloy's perspective because this isn't how Jessica would think of herself. But as we go on, it's clear we're seeing things from Jessica's perspective.

    Good luck!

    Cheri

    Old Man Blueriver gets right into the action. Pacing and drama are solid. Well done.

    mai

    The Blueriver scene would have been the best opening. It wasn't enough to get me to turn a page, though.

    The POV isn't clear.

    Also, I was connecting with Mike, but Misty's remembered opinion of his voice ("Later Misty would say he sounded like a little girl.") turned my attention to her and the future of the story -- a dead-end in both cases, at this point in the book. For me, that broke the flow of drama, story and connection.

    Patty

    Same for me. Neither prologue nor chapter compelled me. There was a lot of telling and very little emotion, implied or otherwise. I thought Janet's observations on the victim were plain callous. She didn't seem to have many redeeming thoughts.

    There was a lot more telling in the chapter. It felt distant.

    But the snippet with Mike... I definitely liked that.

    benwah

    Terri - I'll echo the sentiment that both the prologue and opening lack some tension, in part because there seems a great deal of distance between the reader and the characters, but the segment that Ray has exerpted is definitely a page turner.

    What if you opened your prologue with a description of the body/photograph of the body? Then you could "dolly out," as it were, and place the DA in the scene. As it is, you have a woman turning pages; not terribly engaging.

    I, too, thought Janet's reaction to be a bit off-putting: not horror, dismay, disgust at the crime but laughing at the thought of the childrens' reactions (which she's just surmising anyway).

    Kami

    I found the prologue opening more compelling than the first chapter opening, but they both tossed me out. In the prologue, when the pov character laughed, I was done with her. It seemed inappropriate and too far out of line with what I personally would have done in the same circumstances for me to find her sympathetic.

    There were also some subtly but still noticeably clunky constructions in there. For example she couldn't believe what she was reading, but she'd picked and chosen this case so she had to know something about it, right? And so it made no sense that she'd be surprised by the initial details spelled out for the reader. Also, the first link in the chain--huh? What chain? As far as chain of events, the discovery of the body by the kids seems like the most natural first link and the mother would be second. Anyway. There were similar issues in the first chapter opening. The sentences need to follow one another in a natural flow of thought. These seemed to jump around a bit--not enough to throw me completely out of the story, but unfortunately just enough to catch my attention like a pulled thread in a length of cloth.

    The passive beginning to the chapter and plain ol' description didn't work for me. Also, the sense that all of this had already happened stole the immediacy of the situation. This is a common contrivance and some people like it, but I'm not a fan of reading events that have already happened and having them informed by 'current' knowledge with comments like "she would later ..." The only time I've done all right with it, and I still think the story would have been better without it, is when the 'current' narrator has a charming voice.

    I hope these comments help. Good luck!

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Working...
    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

    Working...

    Post a comment