My Photo

Sites to See

February 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      
Blog powered by TypePad

.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    « Flogometer for Patty: would you keep reading? | Main | Flogometer for Richard: would you keep reading? »

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83453034869e2010534e0d71e970c

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Flogometer for Scott: would you keep reading?:

    Comments

    Amy Nathan

    I see a lot of potential here - but was very distracted by the language and the lack of Show-Don't-Tell.

    My personal preference is not to be told everything up front - like the name of the orphanage or even last names of characters. I'd rather just get sucked into the story than meander around details. (also, I'm really not sure what whipping a hand behind a back means, but maybe it's a boy thing - and I'm not one.)

    For example:

    Julian whipped his hand behind his back. He screamed, but didn't expect the other boys to come rushing into the bathroom.

    With regard to the chapter - my favorite line is the last one posted - "What did Mr. Johnson do to get into restrainst?" I think it would be more compelling higher up in the chapter.

    Just my .02.

    mai

    Several apparently small things bothered me.

    One was Julian whipping his hand behind his back. The image doesn't work for me, because a whip is a very leveraged action, with the power being applied at one end of something, but an arm has an elbow joint which has to bend to get behind the back properly, and that reduces end-point leverage. Whipping the arm behind the back is not something you can actually do unless you're double-jointed. The way you get your hand behind your back is to contract the back and triceps muscles as you rotate the shoulder, elbow and wrist joints.

    I'm being picky about this kind of thing, because both prologue and chapter opening have a lot of details and observations, and unless they're accurate and important to the story, they tend to take the reader out of the story very quickly. Even things like the protagonist's age in the first prologue line is one detail too much. It distracts me from the story. I don't need to know age now. I need to know that the kid has an adversary who's bigger and crueler than he is. I need to know if the substance he's trying to hide from his adversary is something special or not. Things like that. The details are like salt used to season a meal, they're not the meal itself.

    In the chapter opening, the first lines tell about working in the place and its politics. Then cut to a loud crisis. What? That didn't work for me. Also, there seemed to be an emotional disconnect between the doctor and his reaction to the scene he was witnessing. Before he responds to the crisis, he's already considered the potential aptness of the patient for a research project. His edging into the room sounded a little strange -- was he afraid, or was the room so crowded with equipment and personnel that that was the only way he could get in? These are the things I want to know. If he's considering the patient for a study before responding to the patient's crisis, I'd at least like him to show he's aware of his emotional distance from the patient. I assume the doctor is a main character, and I want to have some sympathy for him, whether he's hero or villain.

    I sense there's a good story here. When I read, I want to be pulled into a story. What does that for me are: action, characters, emotions. More of such things, and less salt, would work for me.

    Ray Rhameyr

    Looking at the way the poll is going, it seems that the first chapter, with work, might get there. But it still needs tension and a crisp narrative to do the job.

    benwah023

    Count me as a reader who doesn't like having details like age and the full name of the orphanarium shoved right at me in the beginning. You can set a scene and weave those details in.

    I also found Julian's whipping arm difficult to block in my head.

    The scene you've set in interesting enough -- two kids grappling on the floor, one bully, one bullied. And Ray tells us the twist, that the pellets are poison, so that's rather neat. But it's cumbersome. I wonder if the bully would say something like "Is it candy?" as opposed to food. Made me think they're starving. Then again, maybe that's your point.

    "Too afraid to hear anything." Doesn't make sense to me. Do you mean that the other boys engage in some selective hearing, that they won't get involved? In that case they might hear, but they wouldn't act.

    As for the first chapter, the opening paragraph was full of non-sequitors. The doctor loves working at Peter Bent...loves it too much. Fine, explain what you mean by that. Instead you begin talking about how research is a crucial part of promotion. Again, maybe you'd be better off weaving that in. The frothing patient is interesting, and the dialogue around that scene is good. So perhaps you have your doctor seeing this patient and identifying him as a research subject...which would satisfy his academic demands, so he can stay on at the hospital. I think that's what you're trying to say, but the order in which you've presented it is not necessarily clear and doesn't read smoothly.

    Kathy

    What stopped me was the disconnect between all the characters. What I mean is: in the prologue, we have Julian and Billy. In chapter one, it's Dr. Randall and Raymond.

    What's the connection among them? I couldn't figure out how the prologue related to the chapter and subsequent story.

    But that's just me.

    Kami

    I was too far outside the pov character's heads for my taste. That may have been necessary with the kid, so that we don't know if he set Billy up (premeditated) or withheld information (crime of passion without really thinking through the full consequences of his actions.) Although I was more firmly in the doctor's head, his thoughts seemed, as one other reviewer put it, distanced. He wasn't really engaged in anything except the idea of a study, and he seemed reluctant to do that. He didn't seem to care about anything except advancement, which made me wonder if he was a villain. If he's a villain, and Julian is a murderer, who is the reader supposed to be rooting for here? The guy who's tied up?

    Deana

    I remember when I used to think that I had, simply had! to give as much information upfront as possible. I guess I was afraid the reader wouldn't "get it."

    But the truth is, readers don't need to be lead by the nose into your scene. They would far rather step into your character's head and take it from there.

    Don't worry about the details. They have a way of working themselves in naturally if you let them, and your readers won't be any the worse for waiting!

    kathy

    "You couldn't stay at Trent unless you got promoted, and you couldn't get promoted only as a superb clinician,

    For whatever reason this line stopped me. "Couldn't get promoted" Is that correct? I would appriciate any advice.

    I would have turned the page on the prologue, I assumed that the whipping of the arm was the bully twisting it behind him.
    Keep at it!

    Sheila

    I've been thinking about this, because I like it, but there's something not working for me. There are lots of good comments here, but I think what didn't work for me was the flow of the writing.

    In the prologue, I found the dialog set too far apart from the description. For me, and this is subjective of course, it would work better like this:

    Julian Barth whipped his hand behind his back as Billy stepped toward him.

    "I don't know what you're talking about, Billy!" Julian hoped someone would hear him, though he knew all the other boys at the orphanage were as scared of Billy as he was. They weren't going to to come rushing into the lavatory to help him.

    I had the same problem with the third paragraph of the opening, though for a different reason. Instead of flowing, it reads like a police report. Someone was (verb)ing over here and someone was (verb)ing over there. And another person was (verb)ing next to him. I think you need to mix up the language a bit. To show you what I mean -

    The resident psychiatrist, Chris Peck, was wiping spittle off his cheek and trying to look casual about it. Next to Peck stood a nurse, sensibly wearing goggles, gown, and mask. That had to be Laura Raino, judging from her height and carriage.

    Just my $.02. I wish you luck!

    Scott

    Thank you all. Great comments.

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Working...
    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

    Working...

    Post a comment