My Photo

Sites to See

February 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      
Blog powered by TypePad

.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    « Flogometer for Kenyon: would you keep reading? | Main | Flogometer for Irena: would you keep reading? »

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83453034869e200e554abd9088833

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Flogometer for Mike: would you keep reading?:

    Comments

    Kamila Miller

    I personally didn't have much of a problem with the prose. I enjoyed the sinister mood of it all. Having said that, there were hints of game fiction (which some people enjoy but I don't particularly so bear that in mind) and mwa ha ha that put me off.

    So these guys are just bald-faced evil? Why would I want to read about them? If the first one on the scene had a problem I could relate to and/or if the second guy on the scene seemed charismatic, kindly (that's always creepy, to have a kindly bad guy) or otherwise worthy of following I might be intrigued.

    Deana

    "The necromancer's glowing blue sword hissed and sizzled with each snowflake unfortunate enough to fall against the exposed blade."

    JUST FOR COMPARISON'S SAKE:

    The necromancer's sword sizzled with each snowflake that fell against the blade.

    So...knowing as we do how critical the first sentence is...

    Which one does a better job of getting the READER to the action, and which one does a better job of satisfying the WRITER'S desire for complicated prose?

    (I'm not saying you have to pare it down to the bare bones, just trying to make a contrast.)

    Mai

    I liked (in some cases, loved) many of the individual images - some of them really came to life.

    I thought there was overwriting, though, which subtracted from the images' impact, and slowed the story down.

    I have no problem with two baddies dueling it out. Bad guys are often the life of the party. There were missed opportunities to give life and depth to the characters. The necromancer has grit, but the overwriting can lead the reader to infer he's weaker than he really is. (And if a bald head isn't an important point for the opening, why include it?)

    I loved the opening image of a sword that's glowing blue and so hot it makes snowflakes melt with a sizzle. If told more economically, it's a gripping first image.

    If underwritten (is there such a thing?) I think the images, scenes and characters could really pop. I was close to turning the page because the scenes were vivid, but there were action and character muddinesses that came simply from the effects of overwriting, and I hesitated and didn't turn.

    Mai

    Forgot to say this about "chalky white wrist"... Chalky is not a great modifier for white. Chalky is a textural adjective. It carries its color (whitish) along with it. If his wrist had a chalky texture and was also white, you can write "chalky wrist". But if you mean a particular shade of white and the skin is normal-textured, the better way to write it is "chalk-white wrist" or "chalk-colored wrist".

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Working...
    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

    Working...

    Post a comment