My Photo

Sites to See

February 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      
Blog powered by TypePad

.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    « Flogometer for Kamila: would you keep reading? | Main | Flogometer for Dennis: would you keep reading? »

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83453034869e200e5539078d68834

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Flogometer for Sheila: would you keep reading? :

    Comments

    Kitty

    Judging by the names, I don't read this genre, but I absolutely LOVED this beginning!

    Ray's edits do make it stronger.

    Well done :~)

    ...

    Aredendra

    I just wanted Shelia to know that the second I read the first line, I smiled. I had the instant impulse that this would be a great read.

    Just as a small after thought, I actually did agree with the author's original secondary 'he knew' staying present, but I personally would throw some italics on it to give it that little bit of somethin'.

    Jessica

    Me? I loves the prickly main characters. Excellent, clear, clean writing. Love it!

    Kathleen

    This story has a funny voice that engaged me from the start. I usually don't read fantasy, but I would stay with this one because of the mixture of suspense and humor. I love the relationship that's established between these two and how the writer hints at the novel's central plot. Ray's edits make the strong writing even stronger.

    Sheila

    Thank you, Ray, and thanks to everyone who commented. I really appreciate the feedback. I had abandoned this work a while ago, mostly because of "fantasy fatigue" but also because it felt flat. It was written in an omniscient voice, and once I changed to close third person not only was it more fun to write, but it really improved the story-telling. Details I had struggled to come up with came naturally when I saw things through my characters' eyes.

    Thanks for that great lesson, Ray!

    Kamila Miller

    Oops, for some reason the post didn't take ...

    The one bit Ray didn't mention that clunked for me was the apprentice's dialogue about the bridge. It sounded too much like author description/intrusion than real yammering. Other than that, I like!

    Jon

    New here. Love the concept for the site. Thanks to Ray for the opportunity for submitters and reading-writers.

    Might I jump in? (I'll assume a 'yes' :o) )

    Sheila, I mostly liked this. Could use a bit of structure-work (IMO), but I liked it. Up to the last paragraph, I would have read on; the last paragraph gave me some doubt.

    Forgive my edits? Perhaps something like this would help?


    Hightower couldn't kill his apprentice.

    Too bad, really. It would be so simple, and so very satisfying. Why, just now, as their horses crossed the bridge into Rudyten, one swift kick would send the boy into the raging water below. Edric was leaning over, gawking at the river. Hightower's boot quivered in its stirrup as Edric incessant jabbering droned on.

    " . . . and look at this bridge, three elegant arches followed by a drawbridge. Do they ever raise it? I bet not, who would dare attack this city? Look at that wall, there must be fifty, nay, a hundred towers around it, though I can't see the whole thing. This city is so vast. I've heard . . ."

    Hightower seethed in silence as Edric babbled on, oblivious. The master's hands were cramped. His whole body was tense. Stupid boy!

    Hightower breathed deep to calm himself.

    It wasn't Edric's fault he was on edge, truth be told. It was [NAME]'s.

    Hightower hadn't been back to Rudyten since [NAME]'s confirmation as [whatever], damn his inadequate eyes. With revenge at hand, a heady brew of glee and trepidation coursed through Hightower's veins.

    It was downright agitating, was what it was.

    >>

    Hightower couldn't kill his apprentice.

    Too bad, really.

    --

    This carries the same sentiment as the original, but dramatizes it.

    -------
    Hightower's boot quivered in its stirrup

    --

    Leaves the reader to read what s/he wants to into this.

    ---------

    Hightower seethed in silence as Edric babbled on, oblivious. The master's hands were cramped. His whole body was tense.

    --

    First, cut "to the fact..." because it was unnecessary.

    Second, pulled out the "felt" bits because they were distancing. There are valid reasons for having a distant narrator, but that narrator should add something to the story; in this case, the distance was only adding distance at a time when you presumably want the reader to engage with/feel close to Hightower.

    --------

    Hightower breathed deep to calm himself.

    It wasn't Edric's fault he was on edge, truth be told. It was [NAME]'s.

    --

    The original: "After a deep breath Hightower calmed himself, noting, with annoyance, that it wasn't Edric's fault he was on edge."

    introduces lots of distancing: first, using sequencing ("after...calmed") tends to make readers puzzle at sequences instead of engaging; next, the "noting, with annoyance" bit intruded the narrator; last, "...that it wasn't Edric's fault" overexplains things and swells that narrator's involvement.

    The rest of what I did to that last paragraph was along the same tack. If the goal is to ask the reader to identify closely with a character, then introducing a further perspective may work counter to that.

    Hope this is useful!

    -j

    Sheila

    Jon, you completely nailed the voice/attitude I was aiming for in the first sentence. Great advice, I really appreciate it!

    Jon

    No problem, Sheila.

    One thing to note--sometimes you may -want- that distance. It's a tool in the box; use it as seems appropriate. But be aware when you're using it, and what you hope to accomplish with it--that way you can test it against your readers to find out if you succeed or not.

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Working...
    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

    Working...

    Post a comment