My Photo

Sites to See

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Blog powered by TypePad

.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    « Flogometer for Jan: would you keep reading? | Main | Yippee! I have to scrap half of my novel! »

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83453034869e200e55220eb018834

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Flogometer for Jack: would you keep reading? :

    Comments

    I too would have turned the page. The only things that bugged me Ray pointed out, and they were nits, with one exception. For some reason "Tell me something I don't know" rang false for me. It knocked me partially out of the story. I think it's because "I brought my own" as a response to what's presented as hyperbole is borderline as far as real dialogue anyway. The tell me line takes it one step too far.

    Good stuff!

    I'm not looking for nitpiks, but I would eliminate the following:
    'If you don't have a gun when you walk in, management issues you one."

    "I brought my own."

    "Tell me something I don't know."'

    Unnecessary, and they slow me down.

    Bottom line: I'd definitely turn the page!

    ...

    I might rearrange the first paragraph:

    "All that remained of Jack Farber's Private Investigation Agency were some pipes sticking up from the foundation and half of a toilet. Jack recognized his toilet on the ten o'clock news. Can't go back there, he thought."
    "Jack reached for his cell phone and called his ex-partner. She owed him big time; He still carried the bullet with her name on it and the scar to prove it."

    That makes the subsequent dialog a little more important. He gets to reveal the sleazy bar, she chides him and then he asks that fateful question -- "What do the police know?" and now we know that he's a hard-edged smart-ass, she's snide and impatient and he might have blown his office into teeny, tiny, itty-bitty pieces.

    That's my suggestion.

    Asking more of the reader might create a deeper emotional connection between reader and story -- I felt too much was spelled out too often, for example...

    "anytime soon" -- maybe just "anytime"? The office has been destroyed, so it may be never that he returns.

    "some pipes sticking up from the foundation and half of a toilet" -- maybe just "some pipes and half of a toilet"? Let the reader build a lot of the picture.

    "called his ex-partner who owed him big time" -- maybe just "called his ex-partner. She owed him." -- because "big time" over-emphasizes the tension between the two -- it's already evident, because they have an ex-partnership.

    "He still carried the bullet with her name on it and the scar to prove it" -- maybe "he still carried the bullet with her name on it, and the scar, too" -- "to prove it" projects a flavor of revenge that's probably not going to be part of what happens. He's calling in a debt, but probably not going on a vendetta against his ex-partner.

    If Maggie has an APB out on Jack, she cares about him, which supports my sense that though they're ex-partners, they'll be able to work together.

    "'Some stinking dive called The Bloody Bucket' Jack said tracing his finger along the sticky bar." -- maybe just "'Some dive called the Bloody Bucket,' Jack said, looking at the sticky bar counter." -- because "The Bloody Bucket" is already overkill in terms of conveying what kind of place it is, and Jack is unlikely to dirty his hands by tracing his finger along the sticky bar, if he doesn't like places like that.

    "'Good God, what are you doing in that death trap? If you don't have a gun when you walk in, management issues you one.'" -- maybe just "'What are you doing in that place? If you don't have a gun when you walk in, management issues you one.'" All the message you want to convey is adequately handled by the "If you don't have a gun..." line --

    "'I brought my own.'
    "'Tell me something I don't know.'" -- I can't imagine experienced investigators saying things like this. Both would know he's armed.

    "'I need a favor. I need to know what the police found in the rubble.'" -- maybe just "I need to know what the police found in the rubble." -- he's already made it clear he's calling in a debt.

    "'I was told the fire investigators found two suspicious items...'" -- maybe just "The fire investigators found two items..." -- otherwise, it's too legalistic and defensive -- "I was told..." and "suspicious" have Maggie trying to put the weight of the findings onto the fire investigators -- but if she's a competent investigator, she's in the business because she questions everything, and stands behind her own findings, so she can flat-out state what she's heard, and her ex-partner will understand the implications that someone told her, and they told her because the items were suspicious.

    My sense was that I was being lectured to -- everything was spelled out too clearly. It left me, the reader, with nothing to do. I lost interest, despite good promise of action, because there was nothing to engage me deeply enough to make me want to turn the page. The basics are there. Just give me, the reader, more work to do, and I'll get engaged with your story.

    FWIW "APB" is not correct. The term is BOLO--Be On the Lookout.

    A good resource is from the "Howdunit" series "Police Procedure & Investigation - a Guide for Writers" by Lee Lofland.

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Working...
    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

    Working...

    Post a comment