My Photo

Sites to See

February 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      
Blog powered by TypePad

.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    « Flogometer for Rob: would you keep reading? | Main | Flogometer for Chris: would you keep reading? »

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83453034869e200e5520c62b78834

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Flogometer for Glenda: would you keep reading? :

    Comments

    Kamila Miller

    The tension in this opening is what turns the page for me. It has great elements--unanswered questions (though some of it's confusing,) danger, a dynamic setting. It has some weaknesses that are hurting it. Ray mentioned the word repetition. It has rhythm repetition as well. The opening sentences all had the same structure, approximate length, and feel. To a reader they end up reading like a more complex version of Spot is a dog. Spot is brown. Spot has four legs.

    My confusion arises from the child apparently being in the room alone and yet there's this dagger rising. I'd definitely read on, but if I was 'tricked' I'd probably stop. There's a fine line between excluding information to create surprise and leaving out obvious information to trick the reader. Hopefully that line isn't crossed.

    Kitty

    Putting a child in danger would make me think twice before reading. (Same goes for animals, btw.)

    That said ... I think you have the beginnings of a good read. The imagery these lines conjure is very good: "Darkness invades the room. Not the darkness created by the absence of light but the darkness created by evil and fed by fear." Simply stated yet powerful.

    Ray has given you good suggestions, especially concerning overwriting.

    ...

    Sheila

    Congratulations, Ray, on your 300th post!

    The impression I got from this opening is that someone is egging on a young girl to stab something or someone. "Her hands shake and the blade quivers," seems to indicate this, plus the disembodied voice saying, "do it now!" That's kind of a gruesome scenario, but one that would keep me reading, with my stomach in knots, to see what happens.

    I didn't really feel her terror, though. Perhaps it was the omniscient POV, perhaps it was that the scene setting wasn't clear. It's hard, in 16 lines, to do this. Including the right details might help add terror and improve clarity. For instance, you place the "others" in the room and describe them as screaming. I could picture a hundred different scenes with this description. If the girl stole a quick glance at their faces and saw them flickering in the candlelight (one candle? many? the lighting is also unclear), would she see them wincing in fear, some hiding their faces because they cannot bear to watch? Or perhaps they are screaming to egg her on, with blood-thirsty expressions?

    Good luck!

    Sally

    Sorry, I'm not in agreement on this one. It just seemed terribly melodramatic and even with the corrections Ray suggested, still too overwrought...something like Stephen King having a William Shatner moment. JMO. Sorry.

    Mai

    Sometimes the writing took me out of the story or mood: "Outside, high winds and heavy rains pound the deserted beach." -- this pulled me outside and broke the flow of the story. If one word's position were changed, like this: "High winds and heavy rains pound the deserted beach outside." -- I could see outside from within, and mood and story flow would be maintained. This: "The storm surge threatens to swallow the lonely house perched on top of the dunes." -- took me into the realm of weather reporting -- science, the impersonal -- and weakened my emotional connection with the story.

    Things like these softened the build of tension. Because they came early on in the opening, I became impatient, and didn't want to turn the page. The rhythm and texture of the writing are too regular, as others have pointed out. This makes for a sense of condescension, of author towards reader, that I found annoying.

    (Congrats on 300 posts, Ray!)

    Bill

    The most confusing Western I ever read. But if some of the confusion could be turned into honest mystery, I’d read on with enthusiasm (honest mystery as opposed to the bogus, misleading mystery that Kamila mentions). Personally, I like the choppy sentences in the first paragraph.

    I think Ray’s suggestions are a great help, especially mentioning the hurricane first. But the sentence poses a problem of logic for me. It sounds like, wham, everything is destroyed at once, and if that’s so, sayonara to the house we’re sitting in. Tornadoes move at great and terrifying speed, but hurricanes destroy almost in slow motion. I think the impending destruction could be used to good effect. Also, if the windows are boarded up, I’m left in the dark in the second sentence. Maybe bringing in the candlelight earlier would set the scene more completely. Should “razor sharp” be hyphenated? Otherwise, I’m really interested to know what’s going on!

    Glenda

    Thank you, everyone, for your comments. I will take them all under consideration while editing and rewriting this novel.

    I wanted to leave the reader uncertain as to who actually did the stabbing. It is important to the plot later on.

    Thanks again for all the input.

    Ray Rhamey

    Glenda, you did a good job of not quite letting us decide that the child did the stabbing. However, there are no alternatives present, so I'm not so sure that everyone will get it. Can you let us see more of who else is in the room? Or something to give us an alternative stabber to vacillate between?

    L.L. Abbott

    Yeeks, indeed!!!!

    Instead of: "Smells of turpentine and fresh paint crowd the room." which tells more that shows, I would suggest: 'Turpentine and fresh paint permiated the room.' -- as 'knowing' there was a stench to her surroundings didn't bother me.

    What did was the "others" sleeping (?) in a room full of toxic fumes? That doesn't make sense. So for me this needs to be clarified.

    And, no one was able to stop a "child" wielding a knife? Were they adults or other children?

    Don't get me wrong, I would definitely turn the page.

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Working...
    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

    Working...

    Post a comment