My Photo

Sites to See

February 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      
Blog powered by TypePad

.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    « Flogometer for Stephanie: would you keep reading? | Main | Flogometer for Linda: would you keep reading? »

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83453034869e200e550212af08834

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Flogometer for Ajaya: would you keep reading?:

    Comments

    Jill

    I thought this was really nice - not exactly action-packed, but his skill with language and description might make many "relational" readers want more. It certainly did for me. One of the best submissions I've seen yet.

    P.S. I LOVE this site, and I think it's only a matter of time before you really see your numbers go up. Extremely useful and entertaining at the same time.

    mai

    If I were well-rested, I'd have turned the page because I liked the writing that much. But if I were tired, I wouldn't have turned, because I was irritated by the missing article "a" before "yellow bucket-on-wheels" and other similar small lapses from standard English.

    I've done bit of first reading for Indian writers, and that article dropping, and a few other things, are consistent in a lot of writing coming from Asia. Even India's biggest newspapers publish pieces with dropped articles, etc.

    In the case of this opening, it's clear that Ajaya is a serious and very good writer indeed, and these lapses are colloquialisms.

    But the opening being submitted at FtQ means the author is thinking of the international market, not a local one.

    * * *

    I'll repeat my comment and drop many of its articles, to show how, for readers expecting the articles, missing articles would create stumbling points in the flow of the text...


    If I were well-rested, I'd have turned page because I liked writing that much. But if I were tired, I wouldn't have turned, because I was irritated by missing article "a" before "yellow bucket-on-wheels" and other similar small lapses from standard English.

    I've done bit of first reading for Indian writers, and that article dropping, and few other things, are consistent in a lot of writing coming from Asia. Even India's biggest newspapers publish pieces with dropped articles, etc.

    In case of this opening, it's clear that Ajaya is serious and very good writer indeed, and these lapses are colloquialisms.

    But opening being submitted at FtQ means author is thinking of international market, not local one.

    Marianne

    I liked this piece - it's nicely descriptive, sets the scene well, and I probably would have turned the page to find out a) why he carried the statue b) what's going on between Khemman and his wife and c)how his mother died. Although I would have been looking for more action, or some dialogue, after the scene setting.

    Re the water freezing - I wondered if Ajaya meant as in frozen - ie unmoving. A language blip like the dropped articles.

    I think the feeling for the statue does need explaining as a reflexive action, and yes statue sounds a bit large for a pocket.

    I was wondering though - does it matter that we don't know who Kanchi Nani is at this point? Is that not something to turn the page for?

    And Ray - I also wondered why you changed the 'began to' into simple past tense verbs. For me the 'began to' worked - it signified a slight shift in the action, ie he had not been continuously fidgeting but suddenly began to feel bored or impatient or whatever. I saw him change from observing to experiencing his own frustration.

    Anyway - good writing.

    Ray

    Marianne, my personal take on "began to" and "started to" is that most of the time they are a waste of time. Here's a link to a post I did on the subject:

    http://www.floggingthequill.com/flogging_the_quill/2006/04/dont_get_me_sta.html

    Marianne

    Okay - I get that. I see lots of 'began to' and 'started to' in your examples that could and should have gone.

    But I'm still left with a feeling about this one. I'm thinking that 'he began to fidget' implies he got into a continuous state of fidgeting, meaning he couldn't sit still. 'He fidgeted' implies he just did it once and then stopped.

    What did Ajaya intend to say?

    (I know I'm nit-picking here, but I'm finding this interesting!)

    Ray

    Marianne, as I've said, there are no rules in writing. If it feels like there should be a "began to" or "started to" in the narrative, then do it. I use it once in a while when it is the right (by my standards) thing to do in order to deliver the character's experience.

    Most of the time, though, I think it's clutter. But that's just me.

    Danie

    Are we over-thinking the "action" opening, perhaps? Action is something happening vs. backstory narrative. It doesn't have to be a car chase. I thought that Ajaya did a good job of setting the scene. He's in an airport, there's a lot going on around him, and he describes it very well.

    He also raises story questions which would make me turn the page. I'd have to read more to pass judgment on whether this is the best place to start his story, and as a reader, I give a book more than a sixteen-line chance.

    I recently gave the worst book I ever read a 50 page chance, put it away with no small amount of frustration, picked it up days later and forced myself to finish it hoping that it would redeem itself (which it never did).

    It's frustrating that some publishers buy on the strength of a famous name vs. merit. Do they even look at what they're buying from their established authors anymore, let alone put the mss in the hands of an editor?

    It must be frustrating for aspiring new novelists. I'm now reading Ray's as yet unpublished book, "We the Enemy." (If you haven't asked for it yet, I highly recommend it.) I can't understand why this book still hasn't been picked up by a publishing house when too many shelves are filled with mediocre work from established writers.

    But I'll get off my soapbox. This isn't the place for it, but a good blog topic, I think.

    Ray Rhamey

    Thanks for the compliment, Danie. I'm not necessarily looking for action in an opening, but I do demand tension. For me, the opening paragraph did nothing to generate any. And keep in mind that when you read these you're playing the part of a beleaguered agent with a headache, opening the fifteenth sample of the day. You have no patience, and you demand excellence or it's just not worth your time. Be tough! (They will.)

    Ray

    Bartleby

    I found this excerpt very promising. The first paragraph could benefit from further cutting and tightening. I think Ajaya possesses a rare commodity, talent!, but struggles at times with the English language. Case in point: "Deep in his heart, he had added uneasiness".

    The first paragraph set the mood. It explains why the character is in an introspective mood. Ajaya did so beautifully by the very nice arrhythmia metaphor that relates the not-business-as-usual proceedings at the airport with his own growing uneasiness. I thought "the recent loss of Kanchi Nani" was effective in arousing my curiosity. If Ajaya had spoken of the recent death of his mother it would have been far less suspenseful to me.

    I share somewhat Danie's frustration in that "kick-ass" titles and other deft devices to hook the reader make me leery. I recently started a book with a grandiose opening sentence. After ten pages i gave up on the book from utter boredom. In many books, a critical reader is expected to make a great leap of faith because of credibility issues. I prefer books with a slow and subtle beginning that builds into a credible conflict without resorting to deus-ex-machina devices to resolve a stupendous, sensational, page-turning plot that is too extreme to be true.

    Ray Rhamey

    Bartleby and other readers, I sure hope you don't think I'm advocating "deus-ex-machina devices to resolve a stupendous, sensational, page-turning plot that is too extreme to be true."

    That's not good storytelling. But we are talking about the ability of an opening to raise COMPELLING story questions. For examples of openings that I think do the job without resorting to the kind of hoopla Bartleby talks about, check out this link:

    http://www.floggingthequill.com/flogging_the_quill/2005/01/it_takes_story_.html

    Ray

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Working...
    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

    Working...

    Post a comment