My Photo

Sites to See

February 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      
Blog powered by TypePad

.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    « Flogometer for Danie: would you keep reading? | Main | “I’m mad as hell, and I’m not going to take this any more.” »

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83453034869e200e5505f99a88834

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Flogometer for Jan: would you keep reading?:

    Comments

    C

    Great job, Jan. I'd keep reading.

    Totally agree with Ray - kill the Pauline segment or lengthen to a whole scene if her situation is more compelling. (Doubtful though since you hint that her threat of danger is over for the moment.)
    Agree with Ray about the Michelle reference. It really threw me.
    Other than that I liked the whole scene.
    I also liked the way you slipped in extra info like "barrister demeanor."

    Sheila

    I loved the first paragraph. If I had written it, I would be really reluctant to let it go. It grabs you right away - you can feel her fatigue and despair and I love the bit about the stench still in her nose. I would definitely keep reading.

    That being said, I agree with Ray that the quick change to another POV was irritating. I felt a little bit teased that Pauline was so quickly dropped. But I think the first paragraph is stronger than the next scene.

    JanW

    Thanks for the mark-up, Ray, and thanks to C and Sheila for comments. I hope others write their comments before reading this.

    I could use a bit more help, so I'll share what I was after and how this book fits. It's second in a series. Sadhu and the unseen yet detective are on-going characters. Each book has a 'plot character' and in this one, that person is Pauline. Hence the opening with her. So, yes, Ray, she is a POV character, a very important one. At first I wrote the piece withOUT the opening bit from her POV, but then I read from some other advice that it's helpful to open with the central character. Any thoughts now?

    The points about tighter prose are quite helpful and I agree.

    Michelle is a carry-over character from the first book. I take your point that for a new-comer to the books, she would need more grounding to be less mysterious. Will do something about that, hopefully without slowing down the story. She's a 5 y.o. girl.

    Thanks everyone,
    Jan

    c

    Ok - based on the new info and Sheila's opinion, I'd say begin earlier on in the Pauline scene. Extend her thoughts, show her fear, whatever. Keep us with her a bit longer and begin our investment.

    I had a similar prob with a stunted scene and when Ray suggested an elongation it was magic.

    tomdg

    The first para, and in fact the first three sentences (ending "pillow") were what grabbed me. When you jumped POV after just one para, I was momentarily confused.

    Could you extend the scene a little, perhaps to a less-than-one-page chapter all by itself? (aargh, prologue, nooo!) Perhaps you could give a little more setting - all we've got to go on is the pillow. Of course, you may not want to reveal exactly where she is right now. But how about a couple of other details of the room she's in? E.g., keep the sentences you've got, but add a bit after "pillow" and another bit before "But here she was safe". A bit more of how she's feeling might be good - is there blood pounding in her ears, or is she starting to relax? Any muscular aches? Is she still in too much stress to think?

    I think the last sentence of the first para is good and the right place to end that little scene. But I'd suggest a longer punctuation mark after the "safe" - maybe a dash or even a full stop, leaving a fragment for effect.

    I should also say that I don't like multiple POVs at all so you have to factor that out as personal bias.

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Working...
    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

    Working...

    Post a comment