My Photo

Sites to See

June 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Blog powered by TypePad

.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    « Flogometer -- okay, let me have it | Main | Flogometer -- Despite strong writing, I didn't move on »

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83453034869e200e008d169438834

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Hurt me good:

    Comments

    Stephanie

    I thought option 1 was much improved over the previous version which had been commented on. The whole thing felt tighter and it wasn't quite so slow.

    However, if I had to choose, I would go for option 2 as my favourite. That as the introduction grabbed my attention far more. I was curious to find out who the Hawk was and what she was doing - particularly after the pronouncement that she was going to die. With that as the opening, I would have turned the page.

    Susie

    Ray, I like both of these openings better than the original. I still think the second might be more compelling as to a reader wanting to turn the page. I'm questioning - WHY does she KNOW she is going to die today? Who is the guy with the camera? AND - What is this AURA she sees around him? I would turn the page just to find out these things.

    Hope this is a help to you.

    gypsy

    I'm torn. I'd turn the page either way.

    I like the first one because it brings up more big picture questions. The lessi and Drago's intent, the fact that his family unit is with him, it gives a great description of the power of their glamere and also some flavor of the story to come with the introduction of the flying ships contrasting with the helicopters.

    I like the second one because of the swift drop to action and ending on the knowing she was going to die.

    Helen

    I didn't like the "re-write du jour" much at all - it seemed to go from being "information rich" to just plain trying-to-pack-too-much-info-into-one-small-space. The alternative appealed to me far more. I don't think that's just because I'm a woman - although I do find that I engage with female characters more easily. It was more because it was simpler and more elegant, and it ended with that delightfully enigmatic note.

    mai

    being one of the helicopter opening fans, I'd like to support the first, but I can't because it's evidence of a strange self-sabotaging need to do a RD-style story synopsis, despite alt 2's solid evidence that you know how to do a great opening page. imvho, you need to murder that strange need next time you see it anywhere near you.

    as an opening phrase, I can't think of many better than "A slender man in a black overcoat, half-hidden..." slender = danger and speed, black = danger, overcoat = hidden = danger, half-hidden = we can see more than the average person might (i.e., we-the-readers are special to you-the-author). this is dangerous, seductive stuff.

    but I want the helicopter opening. it's just telling us too much. too much. it's like walking into a crowded party a half-hour late. we can't tell who's who, and we miss half the stuff our host shouts into our ears. ah, if we'd only gotten there 20 minutes early, we think, in such situations. 20 minutes early, when we might catch the host or hostess a little unawares, when there are few people and we can see each one for what she or he (maybe) is, when we can see the bones of the room, when we can get our hands on a drink, and settle into / onto a corner, step, pillow, or chair, and position ourselves for the show, the scenes, the stories, the action. let us get there early by not telling us so much. as we sip our drinks, we'll look about us, and we'll get what's what. trust your readers to love your words. give us the just the first bones of the story, and a few characters, in your first 16 lines, please, dear sir.

    Jessica

    Ray--

    I like the first of these two better than the second, and better than the original. The imagery was engaging, but more importantly, it was clear. In the original opening, I felt very confused--led to visualize one set of images then another that contradicted it, then another that contradicted that.

    In the first of the alternatives, the images made sense together, formed a whole picture that I had no trouble either visualizing or understanding. The little girl who was turned into a squirrel *just in time* was the emotional hook for me. Lots happening here, lots of interesting things to make me want to turn the page.

    The first alternate grabbed me by the throat. The second? Not so much.

    I'll be looking for this one one the bookstore shelves!

    mai

    I reread my comment, and reread the alt's, and realized I'd gone in biased. when I go in with no expectations, I respond 100% to alt 2. I recast my vote for alt 2. it's stunning in every respect. I'd buy the book on the basis of that page alone.

    Anonymous

    The second rewrite rocks. I just happened by, so I don't know what either of these two versions are replacing. But the second one, as a couple of previous comments have pointed out, has an immediacy that the first doesn't.

    The protagonist is trying to conceal her identity, but the antagonist has identified her nonetheless, and seems to be hunting her as prey--"I think I got one." Danger and imminent conflict grab you immediately.

    That little sentence also establishes the conflict between these two as part of a much larger, probably very cruel conflict between two different types (races?) of people, and between magic and technology. It's a great way to get readers to buy into a fantastic premise.

    And the last sentence is like setting the cap on a stick of dynamite. I get the sense that things are really going to explode after this. I'm very interested in exploring the world of this story, and I can't wait to find out why Ailia thinks--knows--she's going to die today.

    Ellen

    "Named the Hawk by the people of this city, she..." is a dangling modifier that really confused me; I had to reread the paragraph a couple of times to figure out who was who.

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Working...
    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

    Working...

    Post a comment