My Photo

Sites to See

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Blog powered by TypePad

.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    « Flogometer #6 -- I turned the page, but there's rejection ahead | Main | Flogometer #8—another turn of the page »

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83453034869e200d834df8d7e53ef

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Flogometer #7 -- despite its quality, resistible:

    Comments

    I want to read about the joik! I want to know what happens!

    Give me the rest of the stuff in chit chat from the crowd during the joik.

    (Wow. That was bossy of me. Shows how much I want to read about the joik.)

    I also paused over the image of the head on the ground.

    I liked the writing in this one. I was intrigued by the line: …who knew the world would change because of one song? For my money, that should be the opening line.

    While the back story was distracting, there were a lot of fascinating aspects to this first page. Cut (or filter in elsewhere) the stuff about the gytrash and Sámi, and tell the reader what landed him/her in so much trouble.

    It sounds to me like you may have a workable manuscript. It just needs some tightening and rearranging.
    --maria

    I like the glimpses of the world you're showing, but without the action, turning the page didn't really occur to me. I found the backstory was just too early for me.

    I was taken in by the idea of what happened when trying the joik before the magic...but by the end of that first page, that interest was gone, downtrodden by the world and its extensive fillers.

    I agree with Maria. Who knew the world would change because of one song? would make an awesome opening line.

    I find the writing smooth and easy to read, with the exception of the "head on the ground" image. And it's an intriguing world. But I don't want it all explained to me up front. Show us the mistake he (or she?) made, and the terrible events that followed.

    Too much gytrash, Novgorods, Samis, and Ekaterias in the first page for me.

    I thought Entry #3 was a good example of easing you into the fantasy world before throwing a bunch of unfamiliar names.

    This writing does have a nice voice, and I too liked the line "Who knew the world would change..." I think if there were more 'beef', more action, less world-building out of the gate, it could have promise.


    i love first person. it brings the reader into an immediate intimacy with the narrator. there are several great lines that move you along. i would have turned the page. although i did see FtQ's point about exposition vs. action, the writer did build the suspense. two things, though, that nudged me a bit - the word joik. it made me stop reading. i thought it was a typo. then i had to think about it. then i gave it the benefit of and continued reading. second, Sami and the far flung mining camp - it made me immediately think of one of my favorite sci fi movies, 'enemy mine' with samis, enslaved in a mining camp. not sure if that means anything.

    I would've turned the page. I thought the writing was crisp and clean, and I *so* wanted to know more about Sami sorcerers.

    I have to agree, though that it would've been stronger to insert the backstory into an action scene, the joik being the obvious choice.

    I'm going to keep an eye out for this in the future. I thought the writing was excellent, and if the story is as good as it promises, it wouldn't surprise me to see it in the bookstores one day.

    Not for me, and for the reasons already stated: too much worldbuilding to start with.

    I guess it's a problem with anything which is set in a world which which the readers aren't familiar: the author feels the need to explain the world, the setting, before any of the events that happen in that world make sense. Particularly a problem with fantasy. But it needn't be: rather than starting by explaining the setting, you can always start with characters and actions, things which in isolation are universal and easy to understand.

    Contrast this with #2 - which also takes place in a world I don't know. It doesn't explain that world first, but starts with a character. We start to get hints of the world through the character's thoughts and actions, but it's the character that drives us, not the world.

    I should probably say here that fantasy isn't really my thing. That may be significant: maybe habitual fans of fantasy love reading about new and exciting worlds. I'm much more into characters first and action a close second; an unfamiliar setting is a barrier I must work through to get to what I enjoy. Maybe that's just me.

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Working...
    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

    Working...

    Post a comment