My Photo

Sites to See

September 2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30    
Blog powered by TypePad

.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    « Flogometer #5—last line turns the page, but then . . . | Main | Flogometer #7 -- despite its quality, resistible »

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83453034869e200d83514bae369e2

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Flogometer #6 -- I turned the page, but there's rejection ahead:

    Comments

    Jennifer

    With Ray's cuts and tightening, I would've turned the page, because that last speech by Ruth was intriguing. As it cuts at it in the first read, I might not have turned the page or gone on.

    I like the idea of a book set during the WAFs, but agree the presentation needs a bit less.

    Kammy

    This one worked for me. I felt interest and sympathy towards Frankie, and I wanted find out how she gets her revenge. I agree with Ray's assessment about needing to trim down the sentences. You could trim the first two lines also, since that information is given in paragraph two, and just leave February 14, 1943.

    tomdg

    One never hears this these days, but I think this is too short! I think your first para deserves a whole page, if not a chapter. Show Frankie (I agree about changing the name, or at least starting somehow that makes her gender clearer) opening the package, reading the label inside ("DIY...") and finally finding the bulls' bits - then cursing Captain Ellis to her roommate Ruth. It would make a great start, and also give us much more of a picture of her character before we get to the real action.

    xphios

    Even with Ray's pruning and trimming, I'm not sure I would have turned the page on this one. Unlike some others who have commented, the situation does not interest me.

    thea

    i think this has great potential. it would pack a greater punch if the story opened with more action and dialogue around the incident. i think, and i'm sure i could be wrong, but in 1943, a woman opening such a package would be a lot more horrified by its contents than a horror-movie desensitized woman of today. i'd be upset about more than just the smell! maybe what's not working is the writer's 'voice'. This sounds more 80's top gun stuff than WWII patriotism calling forth women because there was a skills shortage. i might be wrong on that, its just my impression. overall, a promising start.

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Working...
    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

    Working...

    Post a comment