My Photo

Sites to See

February 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      
Blog powered by TypePad

.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    « Flogometer #2—the page turneth | Main | Flogometer #4—another opening clears the hurdle »

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83453034869e200d834dea91a53ef

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Flogometer #3--another page turns:

    Comments

    Dorothy

    I felt immediately immersed in the central character and I liked that.

    If I might maybe alter Ray's edit a little, I'd just say "squinted" rather than "squinted his eyes." I think "squinted" implies it's eyes we're talking about.

    Ray

    I agree with Dorothy. The edit, as I said, was a one-quick-trip-only sort. As she says, losing "his eyes" is a better edit.

    Thanks, Dorothy.

    Ray

    Brenda

    I agree with Ray's edits and would add that the adverb precisely is not needed in the first paragraph.

    In the second paragraph, when the author says "prodding him to search again," the word "search" implied body movement to me, but I wasn't sure. I guess I wanted some quick description of what he's doing with his body, because otherwise he's still standing there feet apart with his arms across his chest, never wavering, even while searching for something.

    Finally, I was thrown off by the alternating of "child" and "it" to refer to the fletcher. To me, a child is not an it, and vice-versa. Or maybe that was just me.

    Jessica

    The crescendo of whistles gave me the shivers. Very suspenseful!

    Maria

    I liked this one. But I agreed that it was a little overwritten in spots. After reading this three times, I got something new each time which tells me I was skimming for some reason at one spot or another.

    How would it read if you went straight into the arrows whistling through the air or the child stumbling into their midst? Do you think it would change the dynamics of the opening hook?

    Judging by this first page only, this feels like something I could curl up with.
    Thanks for posting.
    --maria

    Wendy

    Powerful characterization of Werne, and I'm thoroughly intrigued to know what "poisonwood trees" are.

    I have to disagree with Brenda's criticism of referring to child as "it"; the author calls the child "the creature" in the next sentence, and since the MC had to prepare himself to touch something (which I am assuming is the child), this seems fairly strongly indicative of the MC's attitude toward the child. I saw that as strong characterization, not sloppy writing.

    Virginia Miss

    I'd turn this page, too. I liked the mood and the tension.
    I agree that this needs tightening -- arms crossed, refused to show his nerves, squint.
    I also did not like the use of "it" to refer to a child. If the gender is to be kept a surprise, perhaps just say hands waving. Or, to condense even further, try, "a young fletcher raced from the emaciated trees, hands fending off the whip thin branches."

    Kammy

    I really liked how this passage creates suspense and anticipation, as well as a mysterious feel. I didn't have a problem with the child being referred to as "it". If that's how this character views children, it gives us an insight into what kind of person he might be.

    tomdg

    Doesn't work for me - sorry. "After ..." (backstory) feels like a very weak place to start. Then you have a lot of description of his pose, which is too detailed. I don't care about his stance, I want to know about who he is, where he is, and what he's doing there.

    Para 2 is better. You've got some scenery, and you have Werne doing something (looking around). But if he's on guard, he wouldn't respond to one whistle by looking around and then deciding he can't see anything; he'd assume the whistle was an alert and that there was something nasty out there that he couldn't see - i.e. the lack of a visual reason for the whistle would make him more jumpy, not less.

    para 3 - a fletcher is (normally) someone who makes arrows for a living. How do we know this boy (?) is a fletcher? And why is he / she an "it?" Is "it" an animal? "The whip thin limbs of black slashed at it" makes no sense to me (to what do the limbs belong, and is the "it" here the child described before?) And "Heedless" feels clumsy to me.

    On the positive side, I've got a vague impression of some interesting-sounding forest scenery, and I know what time of day it is. And I don't know what "poisonwood trees" are either, but the name is wonderfully evocative, so I don't need any further explanation of that.

    thea

    the writing is lush, perhaps a bit too lush - and it might be at the expense of the story itself. you don't want to overshadow your story with so much wordiness. your character is in the woods - there is danger, the silence generates uneasiness. it's all about the senses being heightened - pulled as tight as a bow - before all heck breaks loose. don't lose that tension by stretching it out with too much description. good job and the start of a good story.

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Working...
    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

    Working...

    Post a comment