My Photo

Sites to See

February 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      
Blog powered by TypePad

.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    « On subjective differences and bad form | Main | Edit: what would you do?--Part 2 »

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83453034869e200d8343bb9f453ef

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Edit: what would you do?--Part 1:

    Comments

    John

    To the writer of this piece: Sorry to be so blunt--keep in mind, it's only my opinion. Now for the bloodletting.

    I feel the story should start with the second paragraph--the body in the dumpster--and then go directly to the opening paragraph after the first break, the one that ends with, " . . . Hell, I never knew the man."

    After a BRIEF narrative summary (I like the part where the boy is playing cops and robbers with the cars; it gives a little insight), go directly to the green station wagon and continue with the next seven paragraphs.

    This is the story. Virtually everything else should be cut. Way too much narrative discription and summary to hold my attention--there's really nothing going on. If this is a novel, there's time for backstroy devices later on, once the reader is hooked. As for the city discriptions and the scene with the street people discovering the body--are they needed at all? Are they crucial to the stroy? This early on, and without coming from any particular POV, it's like interjecting non-fiction commentary that serves only to disrupt the momentum.

    Pat Loomis

    With all due respect, to the writer of this piece, and without any bloodletting, I agree that this opening chapter of the novel contains too much narrative and far too much description, in particular. I think the writer has a gift where description is concerned, but it needs to be kept under control. In my humble opinion, description should give the reader enough information without overwhelming him, which *some* of this description does. We don't need to know all of the detail he uses in the beginning. We want to know what the story is about and no matter how wonderfully he describes the chill morning and the people in it, it's too much.

    The same thing is true when he switches to first person. Again, tightening up all the little details would help immensely. Yes, it's true that some details can provide insight into the character, but I'm afraid he's gone way overboard here. I would also challenge him to choose the best adjective he can and discard all others; he's using too many.

    I think there is a wonderful story here and that the writer has some fine storytelling skills. At present, though, the chapter needs to be honed down and sharpened in its focus because the beauty of this tale is being lost in too much verbiage.

    As always, my opinion, and it's up to the writer to decide what stays and what goes.

    James C. Hess

    I'm going to have beg off this time when it comes to editing because I am in the throes of a writing competition: I'm the big dog judge in the final stage of judging, and the competition closes to submissions in three days, and it looks like the number of submissions received will set a new record.

    But let me just say this, based on readings I have done previously, both in competitions and workshops: If you don't hook my attention and hold it in the first twenty-five to fifty words you probably won't.

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Working...
    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

    Working...

    Post a comment